fmt.Println("Data mismatch at byte", i, "-  Disregarding version", otherKey)
								continue compareFile
							}
							ok++
						}
					}

					fmt.Printf("Data overlaps (%d bytes). Combining with %q.\n", ok, otherKey)
					for i := range otherM.filled {
						if otherM.filled[i] == 1 {
							m.filled[i] = 1
							m.mapped[i] = otherM.mapped[i]
						}
					}
				}

will switch placement variation between `-start` and `-end` when\n     * the reference element overlaps its boundaries.\n     *\n     * The original placement should have a set variation.\n     */\n    flipVariations: false,\n    /**\n     * @prop {Boolean} flipVariationsByContent=false\n     * The popper will switch placement variation between `-start` and `-end` when\n     * the popper element overlaps its reference boundaries.\n     *\n     * The original placement should have a set variation.\n...

	// Reject all unwanted types.
	want := opts.TraceTypes()
	if !want.Contains(trcInfo.TraceType) {
		return false
	}

	isHTTP := trcInfo.TraceType.Overlaps(madmin.TraceInternal|madmin.TraceS3) && trcInfo.HTTP != nil

	// Check latency...
	if opts.Threshold > 0 && trcInfo.Duration < opts.Threshold {
		return false
	}

	// Check internal path

             * It is invalid for the source path to be a child of the destination
             * path or visa versa.
             */
            if (this.fileLocator.overlaps(dest.getLocator())) {
                throw new SmbException("Source and destination paths overlap.");
            }

            final WriterThread w = new WriterThread();
            w.setDaemon(true);

            try {
                w.start();

- Fixed a bug involving Services of type `LoadBalancer` with multiple IPs and a `LoadBalancerSourceRanges` that overlaps the node IP. ([#109826](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/109826), [@danwinship](https://github.com/danwinship))

    assertThat(expected).hasMessageThat().contains("connected");

    // adjacent below
    assertEquals(Range.closedOpen(4, 4), range.intersection(Range.closedOpen(2, 4)));

    // overlap below
    assertEquals(Range.closed(4, 6), range.intersection(Range.closed(2, 6)));

    // enclosed with same start
    assertEquals(Range.closed(4, 6), range.intersection(Range.closed(4, 6)));

            // Check that no two flags overlap (except combined flags)
            for (int i = 0; i < flags.length; i++) {
                for (int j = i + 1; j < flags.length; j++) {
                    assertEquals(0, flags[i] & flags[j], String.format("Flags at index %d and %d should not overlap", i, j));
                }
            }
        }
    }

    @Nested

      TYPE_PRIORITY, TYPE_RST_STREAM, TYPE_GOAWAY, TYPE_WINDOW_UPDATE -> return BINARY[flags]
    }
    val result = if (flags < FLAGS.size) FLAGS[flags]!! else BINARY[flags]
    // Special case types that have overlap flag values.
    return when {
      type == TYPE_PUSH_PROMISE && flags and FLAG_END_PUSH_PROMISE != 0 -> {
        result.replace("HEADERS", "PUSH_PROMISE") // TODO: Avoid allocation.
      }

    assertThat(expected).hasMessageThat().contains("connected");

    // adjacent below
    assertEquals(Range.closedOpen(4, 4), range.intersection(Range.closedOpen(2, 4)));

    // overlap below
    assertEquals(Range.closed(4, 6), range.intersection(Range.closed(2, 6)));

    // enclosed with same start
    assertEquals(Range.closed(4, 6), range.intersection(Range.closed(4, 6)));

    validations:
      required: true

  - type: textarea
    id: orthogonality
    attributes:
      label: "Orthogonality: How does this change interact or overlap with existing features?"
      description: "Is the goal of this change a performance improvement? If so, what quantifiable improvement should we expect? How would we measure it?"
    validations:
      required: false