verifyNoMoreInteractions(hashFunction, hasher);
  }

  public void testHash_hashesCorrectly() throws Exception {
    HashCode expectedHash = Hashing.md5().hashBytes(testBytes);
    HashingInputStream in = new HashingInputStream(Hashing.md5(), buffer);

    byte[] buf = new byte[4];
    int numOfByteRead = in.read(buf, 0, buf.length);
    assertEquals(4, numOfByteRead);

# OAuth2 mit Passwort (und Hashing), Bearer mit JWT-Tokens { #oauth2-with-password-and-hashing-bearer-with-jwt-tokens }

Da wir nun über den gesamten Sicherheitsablauf verfügen, machen wir die Anwendung tatsächlich sicher, indem wir <abbr title="JSON Web Tokens">JWT</abbr>-Tokens und sicheres Passwort-Hashing verwenden.

Diesen Code können Sie tatsächlich in Ihrer Anwendung verwenden, die Passwort-Hashes in Ihrer Datenbank speichern, usw.

# OAuth2 con Password (y hashing), Bearer con tokens JWT { #oauth2-with-password-and-hashing-bearer-with-jwt-tokens }

Ahora que tenemos todo el flujo de seguridad, hagamos que la aplicación sea realmente segura, usando tokens <abbr title="JSON Web Tokens">JWT</abbr> y hashing de contraseñas seguras.

Este código es algo que puedes usar realmente en tu aplicación, guardar los hashes de las contraseñas en tu base de datos, etc.

Sie sollten niemals Klartext-Passwörter speichern, daher verwenden wir ein (gefaktes) Passwort-Hashing-System.

Wenn die Passwörter nicht übereinstimmen, geben wir denselben Fehler zurück.

#### Passwort-Hashing { #password-hashing }

„Hashing“ bedeutet: Konvertieren eines Inhalts (in diesem Fall eines Passworts) in eine Folge von Bytes (ein schlichter String), die wie Kauderwelsch aussieht.

Let's put that data in the Pydantic `UserInDB` model first.

You should never save plaintext passwords, so, we'll use the (fake) password hashing system.

If the passwords don't match, we return the same error.

#### Password hashing { #password-hashing }

"Hashing" means: converting some content (a password in this case) into a sequence of bytes (just a string) that looks like gibberish.

///

## Password hashing { #password-hashing }

"Hashing" means converting some content (a password in this case) into a sequence of bytes (just a string) that looks like gibberish.

Whenever you pass exactly the same content (exactly the same password) you get exactly the same gibberish.

But you cannot convert from the gibberish back to the password.

### Why use password hashing { #why-use-password-hashing }

		{"a/b/c/", 159},
		{"/a/b/c", 96},
		{string([]byte{0xff, 0xfe, 0xfd}), 147},
	}

	// Tests hashing order to be consistent.
	for i, testCase := range testCases {
		if sipHashElement := hashKey("SIPMOD", testCase.objectName, 200, testUUID); sipHashElement != testCase.sipHash {
			t.Errorf("Test case %d: Expected \"%v\" but failed \"%v\"", i+1, testCase.sipHash, sipHashElement)
		}
	}

 *       array. This hashing API accepts an arbitrary sequence of byte and multibyte values (via
 *       {@link Hasher}), but this is merely a convenience; these are always translated into raw
 *       byte sequences under the covers.
 *   <li><b>hash code:</b> each hash function always yields hash codes of the same fixed bit length
 *       (given by {@link #bits}). For example, {@link Hashing#sha1} produces a 160-bit number,

 *       array. This hashing API accepts an arbitrary sequence of byte and multibyte values (via
 *       {@link Hasher}), but this is merely a convenience; these are always translated into raw
 *       byte sequences under the covers.
 *   <li><b>hash code:</b> each hash function always yields hash codes of the same fixed bit length
 *       (given by {@link #bits}). For example, {@link Hashing#sha1} produces a 160-bit number,

        }
        if (!bits.get(combinedHash % bitSize)) {
          return false;
        }
      }
      return true;
    }
  },
  /**
   * This strategy uses all 128 bits of {@link Hashing#murmur3_128} when hashing. It looks different
   * from the implementation in MURMUR128_MITZ_32 because we're avoiding the multiplication in the
   * loop and doing a (much simpler) += hash2. We're also changing the index to a positive number by