So, the URL for that file would be something like: `/files/home/johndoe/myfile.txt`.

### OpenAPI support

OpenAPI doesn't support a way to declare a *path parameter* to contain a *path* inside, as that could lead to scenarios that are difficult to test and define.

Nevertheless, you can still do it in **FastAPI**, using one of the internal tools from Starlette.

     *
     * - If the stack overflowed after set()/setValue() stored its result, then a call to
     * setException() will be a no-op because the Future is already done.
     *
     * Both scenarios are bad: The output Future might never complete, or, if it does complete, it
     * might not run some of its listeners. The likely result is that the app will hang. (And of

				}
				diskHealthCheckOK(ctx, err)
				if err != nil {
					// It is totally possible that xl.meta was overwritten
					// while being concurrently listed at the same time in
					// such scenarios the 'xl.meta' might get truncated
					if !IsErrIgnored(err, io.EOF, io.ErrUnexpectedEOF) {
						internalLogOnceIf(ctx, err, "metacache-walk-read-metadata")
					}
					continue
				}

Using these ideas, JWT can be used for way more sophisticated scenarios.

In those cases, several of those entities could have the same ID, let's say `foo` (a user `foo`, a car `foo`, and a blog post `foo`).

	// says its local for a given host - it is true for all endpoints
	// for the same host. Following code ensures that this assumption
	// is true and it works in all scenarios and it is safe to assume
	// for a given host.
	endpointLocalMap := make(map[string]bool)
	for _, ep := range endpoints {
		if ep.IsLocal {
			endpointLocalMap[ep.Host] = ep.IsLocal
		}
	}

	// for this instance of unlocker, we should let the
	// caller know that lock is not successfully released
	// yet.
	if len(locks)-tolerance == tolerance {
		// In case of split brain scenarios where
		// tolerance is exactly half of the len(*locks)
		// then we need to make sure we have unlocked
		// upto tolerance+1 - especially for RUnlock
		// to ensure that we don't end up with active

   * example is when a server has just booted, and it is mostly busy with getting itself up to
   * speed).
   *
   * To deal with such scenarios, we add an extra dimension, that of "past underutilization",
   * modeled by "storedPermits" variable. This variable is zero when there is no underutilization,

    # This does not apply to gateway pods as they typically need a different
    # set of DNS settings than the normal application pods (e.g., in
    # multicluster scenarios).
    # NOTE: If using templates, follow the pattern in the commented example below.
    #podDNSSearchNamespaces:
    #- global
    #- "{{ valueOrDefault .DeploymentMeta.Namespace \"default\" }}.global"

    # This does not apply to gateway pods as they typically need a different
    # set of DNS settings than the normal application pods (e.g., in
    # multicluster scenarios).
    # NOTE: If using templates, follow the pattern in the commented example below.
    #podDNSSearchNamespaces:
    #- global
    #- "{{ valueOrDefault .DeploymentMeta.Namespace \"default\" }}.global"

### Is concurrency better than parallelism?

Nope! That's not the moral of the story.

Concurrency is different than parallelism. And it is better on **specific** scenarios that involve a lot of waiting. Because of that, it generally is a lot better than parallelism for web application development. But not for everything.

So, to balance that out, imagine the following short story: