public void testRegistrationWithBridgeMethod() {
    final AtomicInteger calls = new AtomicInteger();
    bus.register(
        new Callback<String>() {
          @Subscribe
          @Override
          public void call(String s) {
            calls.incrementAndGet();
          }
        });

    bus.post("hello");

    assertEquals(1, calls.get());
  }

  public void testPrimitiveSubscribeFails() {

  public void testRegistrationWithBridgeMethod() {
    final AtomicInteger calls = new AtomicInteger();
    bus.register(
        new Callback<String>() {
          @Subscribe
          @Override
          public void call(String s) {
            calls.incrementAndGet();
          }
        });

    bus.post("hello");

    assertEquals(1, calls.get());
  }

  public void testPrimitiveSubscribeFails() {

   *
   * <p>This method should be overridden when bulk retrieval is significantly more efficient than
   * many individual lookups. Note that {@link LoadingCache#getAll} will defer to individual calls
   * to {@link LoadingCache#get} if this method is not overridden.
   *
   * @param keys the unique, non-null keys whose values should be loaded

import java.util.NoSuchElementException;
import java.util.SortedSet;
import javax.annotation.CheckForNull;
import org.checkerframework.checker.nullness.qual.Nullable;

/**
 * A sorted set which forwards all its method calls to another sorted set. Subclasses should
 * override one or more methods to modify the behavior of the backing sorted set as desired per the
 * <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decorator_pattern">decorator pattern</a>.
 *

 * .compare(a.foo, b.bar)}. {@code ComparisonChain} also has a potential performance problem that
 * {@code Comparator} doesn't: it evaluates all the parameters of all the {@code .compare} calls,
 * even when the result of the comparison is already known from previous {@code .compare} calls.
 * That can be expensive.
 *
 * @author Mark Davis
 * @author Kevin Bourrillion
 * @since 2.0
 */
@GwtCompatible
@ElementTypesAreNonnullByDefault

    // TODO: test whether null is supported (create a Feature)
    /**
     * The elements to be returned by future calls to {@code next()}, with the first at the top of
     * the stack.
     */
    final Stack<E> nextElements = new Stack<>();

    /**
     * The elements to be returned by future calls to {@code previous()}, with the first at the top
     * of the stack.
     */

    throw new UnsupportedOperationException();
  }

  /**
   * Not supported. <b>You are attempting to create a map that may contain a non-{@code Comparable}
   * key.</b> Proper calls will resolve to the version in {@code ImmutableSortedMap}, not this dummy
   * version.
   *
   * @throws UnsupportedOperationException always
   * @deprecated <b>Pass a key of type {@code Comparable} to use {@link

    throw new UnsupportedOperationException();
  }

  /**
   * Not supported. <b>You are attempting to create a set that may contain a non-{@code Comparable}
   * element.</b> Proper calls will resolve to the version in {@code ImmutableSortedSet}, not this
   * dummy version.
   *
   * @throws UnsupportedOperationException always
   * @deprecated <b>Pass a parameter of type {@code Comparable} to use {@link

import java.util.Iterator;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.ListIterator;
import javax.annotation.CheckForNull;
import org.checkerframework.checker.nullness.qual.Nullable;

/**
 * A list which forwards all its method calls to another list. Subclasses should override one or
 * more methods to modify the behavior of the backing list as desired per the <a
 * href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decorator_pattern">decorator pattern</a>.
 *

  }

  /*
   * Our implementation works fine with a null `dir`. However, there's nothing in the documentation
   * of the supertype that suggests that implementations are expected to tolerate null. That said, I
   * see calls in Google code that pass a null `dir` to a FilenameFilter.... So let's declare the
   * parameter as non-nullable (since passing null to a FilenameFilter is unsafe in general), but if