//            (__)\       )\/\
    //                ||----w |
    //                ||     ||
    Runnable state = get();
    Blocker blocker = null;
    while (state instanceof Blocker || state == PARKED) {
      if (state instanceof Blocker) {
        blocker = (Blocker) state;
      }
      spinCount++;
      if (spinCount > MAX_BUSY_WAIT_SPINS) {
        /*

  /**
   * {@inheritDoc}
   *
   * @throws NullPointerException if {@code rowKey} is {@code null}
   */
  @Override
  public ImmutableMap<C, V> row(R rowKey) {
    checkNotNull(rowKey, "rowKey");
    return MoreObjects.firstNonNull(
        (ImmutableMap<C, V>) rowMap().get(rowKey), ImmutableMap.<C, V>of());
  }

  @Override
  public ImmutableSet<R> rowKeySet() {

  private OverflowAvoidingLockSupport() {}

  static void parkNanos(@CheckForNull Object blocker, long nanos) {
    // Even in the extremely unlikely event that a thread unblocks itself early after only 68 years,
    // this is indistinguishable from a spurious wakeup, which LockSupport allows.
    LockSupport.parkNanos(blocker, min(nanos, MAX_NANOSECONDS_THRESHOLD));
  }

 *       suffice because we our Android users and tests are using the open-source version, which
 *       would no longer have the problematic test. But why bother when we can instead strip it with
 *       a more precisely named annotation?
 *   <li>While a dependency on Android ought to be easy if it's for annotations only, it will

    }
  }

  public void testNulls() {
    /*
     * Don't bother testing. All non-primitive parameters are used only to construct error messages.
     * We never want to pass null for them, so we haven't annotated them to say that null is
     * allowed. But at the same time, it seems wasteful to bother inserting the checkNotNull calls
     * that NullPointerTester wants.
     *

   */
  private static TestCase generateGuardWithWrongMonitorTestCase(
      final Method method, final boolean fair1, final boolean fair2) {
    final boolean timed = isTimed(method); // Not going to bother with all timeouts, just 0ms.
    return new TestCase(method.getName() + (timed ? "(0ms)" : "()") + "/WrongMonitor->IMSE") {
      @Override
      protected void runTest() throws Throwable {

  @Override
  public void setUp() {
    threadPool = newCachedThreadPool();
  }

  @Override
  public void tearDown() throws InterruptedException {
    threadPool.shutdown();
    assertTrue("Some worker didn't finish in time", threadPool.awaitTermination(10, SECONDS));
  }

  private static <T> int drain(
      BlockingQueue<T> q,
      Collection<? super T> buffer,
      int maxElements,
      long timeout,

    // FRQ tries to load the Finalizer class (for the reference-collecting thread) in a few ways.
    // If the class is accessible to the system ClassLoader (ClassLoader.getSystemClassLoader())
    // then FRQ does not bother to load Finalizer.class through a separate ClassLoader. That happens
    // in our test environment, which foils the purpose of this test, so we disable the logic for

    short s = 2;
    Preconditions.checkState(boxedBoolean.booleanValue(), "", s);
  }

  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // NullPointerTester
  public void testNullPointers() {
    /*
     * Don't bother testing: Preconditions defines a bunch of methods that accept a template (or
     * even entire message) that simultaneously:
     *
     * - _shouldn't_ be null, so we don't annotate it with @Nullable
     *

    @Override
    public boolean contains(@CheckForNull Object rowKey, @CheckForNull Object columnKey) {
      synchronized (mutex) {
        return delegate().contains(rowKey, columnKey);
      }
    }

    @Override
    public boolean containsRow(@CheckForNull Object rowKey) {
      synchronized (mutex) {
        return delegate().containsRow(rowKey);
      }
    }

    @Override