@SuppressWarnings("serial")
  public void testLinkedHashMapWithInitialMap() {
    Map<String, String> map =
        new LinkedHashMap<String, String>(
            ImmutableMap.of(
                "Hello", "World",
                "first", "second",
                "polygene", "lubricants",
                "alpha", "betical"));

    LinkedHashMap<String, String> copy = Maps.newLinkedHashMap(map);

  @SuppressWarnings("serial")
  public void testLinkedHashMapWithInitialMap() {
    Map<String, String> map =
        new LinkedHashMap<String, String>(
            ImmutableMap.of(
                "Hello", "World",
                "first", "second",
                "polygene", "lubricants",
                "alpha", "betical"));

    LinkedHashMap<String, String> copy = Maps.newLinkedHashMap(map);

    assertThat(orig.toString())
        .contains("Exception thrown from implementation: class java.lang.StackOverflowError");
  }

  // Regression test for a case where we would fail to execute listeners immediately on done futures
  // this would be observable from an afterDone callback
  public void testListenersExecuteImmediately_fromAfterDone() {
    AbstractFuture<String> f =
        new AbstractFuture<String>() {

  }

  public void testToStringWithNull() {
    Iterator<@Nullable String> iterator =
        Lists.<@Nullable String>newArrayList("hello", null, "world").iterator();
    assertEquals("[hello, null, world]", Iterators.toString(iterator));
  }

  public void testToStringEmptyIterator() {
    Iterator<String> iterator = Collections.<String>emptyList().iterator();

 *       continuing to run {@code FooTest} itself. This is exactly what happens with {@code
 *       AndroidIncompatible}. But I'm not sure what would happen if we annotated the {@code
 *       suite()} method with {@code Suppress}. Would {@code FooTest} itself be suppressed, too?
 *   <li>In at least one case, a use of {@code sun.misc.FpUtils}, the test will not even

   *
   * <p>If {@code expectedSize} is exactly the number of entries added to the builder before {@link
   * Builder#build} is called, the builder is likely to perform better than an unsized {@link
   * #builder()} would have.
   *
   * <p>It is not specified if any performance benefits apply if {@code expectedSize} is close to,
   * but not exactly, the number of entries added to the builder.
   *
   * @since 23.1
   */

  public void testRemove_nullKeyQueriesUnsupported() {
    try {
      assertFalse(getMap().remove(null, v3()));
    } catch (NullPointerException tolerated) {
      // since the operation would be a no-op, the exception is not required
    }
    expectUnchanged();
  }

  @MapFeature.Require(value = SUPPORTS_REMOVE, absent = ALLOWS_NULL_VALUE_QUERIES)
  public void testRemove_nullValueQueriesUnsupported() {

  public void testRemove_nullKeyQueriesUnsupported() {
    try {
      assertFalse(getMap().remove(null, v3()));
    } catch (NullPointerException tolerated) {
      // since the operation would be a no-op, the exception is not required
    }
    expectUnchanged();
  }

  @MapFeature.Require(value = SUPPORTS_REMOVE, absent = ALLOWS_NULL_VALUE_QUERIES)
  public void testRemove_nullValueQueriesUnsupported() {

   * its runtime check.
   *
   * <p>An example use case for this method is in implementing an {@code Iterator<T>} whose {@code
   * next} field is lazily initialized. The type of that field would be {@code @Nullable T}, and the
   * code would be responsible for populating a "real" {@code T} (which might still be the value
   * {@code null}!) before returning it to callers. Depending on how the code is structured, a

   * </ul>
   *
   * <p><b>Examples</b> (all edges are directed facing downwards)
   *
   * <p>The graph below would be valid input with start nodes of {@code a, f, c}. However, if {@code
   * b} were <i>also</i> a start node, then there would be multiple paths to reach {@code e} and
   * {@code h}.
   *
   * <pre>{@code
   *    a     b      c
   *   / \   / \     |
   *  /   \ /   \    |