logger.Fatal(config.ErrInvalidBrowserValue(err), "Invalid MINIO_BROWSER value in environment variable")
	}
	if globalBrowserEnabled {
		if redirectURL := env.Get(config.EnvBrowserRedirectURL, ""); redirectURL != "" {
			u, err := xnet.ParseHTTPURL(redirectURL)
			if err != nil {
				logger.Fatal(err, "Invalid MINIO_BROWSER_REDIRECT_URL value in environment variable")
			}
			// Look for if URL has invalid values and return error.

So, if you have another file `importer.py` with:

```Python
from myapp import app

# Some more code
```

in that case, the automatically created variable inside of `myapp.py` will not have the variable `__name__` with a value of `"__main__"`.

So, the line:

```Python
    uvicorn.run(app, host="0.0.0.0", port=8000)
```

will not be executed.

!!! info

        "//tensorflow/core:framework",
        "//tensorflow/core/platform:errors",
    ],
)

cc_library(
    name = "resource_variable_ops",
    srcs = [
        "resource_variable_ops.cc",
    ],
    hdrs = [
        "resource_variable_ops.h",
    ],
    visibility = [
        "//tensorflow:internal",
    ],
    deps = [
        "//tensorflow/c/eager:abstract_context",

   * add the suppression to the whole method (which turns off checking for a large section of code),
   * or extract a variable, and put the suppression on that. However, a local variable typically
   * doesn't work: Because nullness analyses typically infer the nullness of local variables,
   * there's no way to assign a {@code @Nullable T} to a field {@code T foo;} and instruct the

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

  public <T> void testCaptureTypeParameter() throws Exception {
    TypeVariable<?> variable = new TypeParameter<T>() {}.typeVariable;
    TypeVariable<?> expected =
        TypeParameterTest.class.getDeclaredMethod("testCaptureTypeParameter")
            .getTypeParameters()[0];
    assertEquals(expected, variable);
  }

  public void testConcreteTypeRejected() {