contains com.google.common.util.concurrent.ListenableFuture class, without
    any other Guava classes. The idea is:

    - If users want only ListenableFuture, they depend on listenablefuture-1.0.

    - If users want all of Guava, they depend on guava, which, as of Guava
    27.0, depends on
    listenablefuture-9999.0-empty-to-avoid-conflict-with-guava. The 9999.0-...

 * {@code Iterable}. Except as noted, each method has a corresponding {@link Iterator}-based method
 * in the {@link Iterators} class.
 *
 * <p><b>Java 8+ users:</b> several common uses for this class are now more comprehensively
 * addressed by the new {@link java.util.stream.Stream} library. Read the method documentation below

 *       look for any annotation named, e.g., "GwtIncompatible," regardless of package.
 *   <li>An annotation named just "Suppress" might suggest to users that the test is suppressed
 *       under all environments. We could fight this by fully qualifying the annotation, but the
 *       result will be verbose and attention-grabbing.

import com.google.common.primitives.Longs;
import java.util.Comparator;
import org.checkerframework.checker.nullness.qual.Nullable;

/**
 * A utility for performing a chained comparison statement. <b>Note:</b> Java 8+ users should
 * generally prefer the methods in {@link Comparator}; see <a href="#java8">below</a>.
 *
 * <p>Example usage of {@code ComparisonChain}:
 *
 * <pre>{@code
 * public int compareTo(Foo that) {

 * the License.
 */

package com.google.common.util.concurrent.internal;


/**
 * Static utilities for {@link InternalFutureFailureAccess}. Most users will never need to use this
 * class.
 *
 * <p>This class is GWT-compatible.
 *
 * @since {@code com.google.guava:failureaccess:1.0}, which was added as a dependency of Guava in
 *     Guava 27.0
 */

   *
   * <p><b>Java 7+ users:</b> this constant should be treated as deprecated; use {@link
   * java.nio.charset.StandardCharsets#ISO_8859_1} instead.
   *
   */
  public static final Charset ISO_8859_1 = Charset.forName("ISO-8859-1");

  /**
   * UTF-8: eight-bit UCS Transformation Format.
   *
   * <p><b>Java 7+ users:</b> this constant should be treated as deprecated; use {@link

/**
 * A comparator, with additional methods to support common operations. This is an "enriched" version
 * of {@code Comparator} for pre-Java-8 users, in the same sense that {@link FluentIterable} is an
 * enriched {@link Iterable} for pre-Java-8 users.
 *
 * <h3>Three types of methods</h3>
 *
 * Like other fluent types, there are three types of methods present: methods for <i>acquiring</i>,

 * existing users, but it can't *fix* existing users because any users who needed
 * `Function<@Nullable A, @Nullable B>` already had to find a workaround. Still, there is a *ton* of
 * fallout from trying to switch. I would be shocked if the switch would offer benefits to anywhere
 * near enough users to justify the costs.
 *

   * return type is plain FilenameFilter. If we made such a change, then the annotation we choose
   * here would have no significance to end users, who would be forced to conform to the signature
   * used in FilenameFilter.)
   */
  @Override
  public boolean accept(File dir, String fileName) {
    return pattern.matcher(fileName).matches();
  }

   * non-nullable {@code cause}, as many users expect to find one.
   */
  public ExecutionError(@CheckForNull String message, @CheckForNull Error cause) {
    super(message, cause);
  }

  /**
   * Creates a new instance with {@code null} as its detail message and the given cause. Prefer to
   * provide a non-nullable {@code cause}, as many users expect to find one.
   */