import java.lang.annotation.Retention;
import java.lang.annotation.Target;

/**
 * Annotates a "top-level" type-variable usage that takes its nullness from the type argument
 * supplied by the user of the class. For example, {@code Multiset.Entry.getElement()} returns
 * {@code @ParametricNullness E}, which means:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@NonNull String>} returns {@code @NonNull

    @Nonnull
    SessionData getData();

    /**
     * Returns immutable user properties to use for interpolation. The user properties have been configured directly
     * by the user, e.g. via the {@code -Dkey=value} parameter on the command line.
     *
     * @return the user properties, never {@code null}
     */
    @Nonnull
    Map<String, String> getUserProperties();

    /**

 * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND,
 * either express or implied. See the License for the specific language
 * governing permissions and limitations under the License.
 */
package org.codelibs.fess.app.web.admin.user;

/**
 * @author shinsuke
 */
public class SearchForm {

    public String id;

        runtime.registerData("adminUser", fessConfig.isAdminUser(username) || fessLoginAssist.getSavedUserBean()
                .map(user -> user.hasRoles(fessConfig.getAuthenticationAdminRolesAsArray())).orElse(false));

        runtime.registerData("pageLoginLink", fessConfig.isLoginLinkEnabled());
    }

     * didn't see that discussed in the review, which included many other
     * changes: http://goo.gl/okTTdr
     *
     * TODO(cpovirk): decide what the best long-term action here is: force users
     * to suppress (as we do now), stop testing entrySet().add() at all, make
     * entrySet().add() tests tolerant of either behavior, introduce a map
     * feature for entrySet() that supports add(), or something else
     */

     * didn't see that discussed in the review, which included many other
     * changes: http://goo.gl/okTTdr
     *
     * TODO(cpovirk): decide what the best long-term action here is: force users
     * to suppress (as we do now), stop testing entrySet().add() at all, make
     * entrySet().add() tests tolerant of either behavior, introduce a map
     * feature for entrySet() that supports add(), or something else
     */

 * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND,
 * either express or implied. See the License for the specific language
 * governing permissions and limitations under the License.
 */
package org.codelibs.fess.es.user.allcommon;

import org.apache.lucene.search.TotalHits;
import org.dbflute.cbean.result.PagingResultBean;
import org.opensearch.action.search.SearchRequestBuilder;
import org.opensearch.search.aggregations.Aggregations;

 * <tr><td><code>basedir</code></td>           <td></td>
 *                                             <td>{@link MavenSession#getExecutionRootDirectory()} or
 *                                                 <code>System.getProperty( "user.dir" )</code> if null</td></tr>
 * <tr><td><code>mojoExecution</code></td>     <td></td>               <td>the actual {@link MojoExecution}</td></tr>

            // that would happen here should cause the build to fail at a later stage
            // (when actually parsing the POM) and will lead to a better exception being
            // displayed to the user, so just bail out and return false.
        }
        return false;
    }

    public static final int SID_TYPE_INVALID = 7;

    public static final int SID_TYPE_UNKNOWN = 8;

    public static final int SID_TYPE_USE_NONE = 0;

    public static final int SID_TYPE_USER = 1;

    public static final int SID_TYPE_WKN_GRP = 5;

    protected FessConfig fessConfig;

    @PostConstruct
    public void init() {
        if (logger.isDebugEnabled()) {