* <p><b>Warning:</b> using a bounded executor may be counterproductive! If the thread pool fills
   * up, any time callers spend waiting for a thread may count toward their time limit, and in this
   * case the call may even time out before the target method is ever invoked.
   *
   * @param executor the ExecutorService that will execute the method calls on the target objects;
   *     for example, a {@link Executors#newCachedThreadPool()}.
   * @since 22.0

      }

      @Override
      public Entry<E> next() {
        if (!hasNext()) {
          throw new NoSuchElementException();
        }
        // requireNonNull is safe because current is only nulled out after iteration is complete.
        Entry<E> result = wrapEntry(requireNonNull(current));
        prevEntry = result;
        if (current.succ() == header) {
          current = null;
        } else {

    if (index >= 0) {
      return inclusive ? index : index + 1;
    } else {
      return ~index;
    }
  }

  // Pretend the comparator can compare anything. If it turns out it can't
  // compare two elements, it'll throw a CCE. Only methods that are specified to
  // throw CCE should call this.
  @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
  Comparator<Object> unsafeComparator() {

    // If we clip the safe range used during the per-character tests so it is
    // below the values of characters in surrogate pairs, this cannot occur.
    // This approach does mean that we break out of the fast path code in cases
    // where we don't strictly need to, but this situation will almost never
    // occur in practice.
    if (safeMin >= Character.MIN_HIGH_SURROGATE) {

    AtomicDoubleArray aa = new AtomicDoubleArray(0);
    assertEquals(0, aa.length());
    assertThrows(IndexOutOfBoundsException.class, () -> aa.get(0));
  }

  /** get and set for out of bound indices throw IndexOutOfBoundsException */
  public void testIndexing() {
    AtomicDoubleArray aa = new AtomicDoubleArray(SIZE);
    for (int index : new int[] {-1, SIZE}) {

   * without the guard being satisfied (due to timeout, but not interrupt) can then immediately exit
   * the monitor without signalling. If it timed out without being signalled, it does not need to
   * "pass on" the signal to another thread. If it *was* signalled, then its guard must have been
   * satisfied at the time of signal, and has since been modified by some other thread to be

  </dependencies>
  <build>
    <resources>
      <resource>
        <directory>..</directory>
        <includes>
          <include>LICENSE</include> <!-- copied from the parent pom because I couldn't figure out a way to make combine.children="append" work -->
          <include>proguard/*</include>
        </includes>
        <targetPath>META-INF</targetPath>
      </resource>
    </resources>
    <plugins>
      <plugin>

    AtomicDoubleArray aa = new AtomicDoubleArray(0);
    assertEquals(0, aa.length());
    assertThrows(IndexOutOfBoundsException.class, () -> aa.get(0));
  }

  /** get and set for out of bound indices throw IndexOutOfBoundsException */
  public void testIndexing() {
    AtomicDoubleArray aa = new AtomicDoubleArray(SIZE);
    for (int index : new int[] {-1, SIZE}) {

      fail();
    } catch (IllegalArgumentException expected) {
    }
  }

  /**
   * If there's a bug in builder growth, we wouldn't know how to expose it. So, brute force the hell
   * out of it for a while and see what happens.
   */
  public void testBuilder_bruteForce() {
    for (int i = 0; i < reduceIterationsIfGwt(100); i++) {

      fail();
    } catch (IllegalArgumentException expected) {
    }
  }

  /**
   * If there's a bug in builder growth, we wouldn't know how to expose it. So, brute force the hell
   * out of it for a while and see what happens.
   */
  public void testBuilder_bruteForce() {
    for (int i = 0; i < reduceIterationsIfGwt(100); i++) {