version number is enough for some build systems (notably, Gradle) to select
    that empty artifact over the "real" listenablefuture-1.0 -- avoiding a
    conflict with the copy of ListenableFuture in guava itself. If users are
    using an older version of Guava or a build system other than Gradle, they
    may see class conflicts. If so, they can solve them by manually excluding

  <groupId>org.apache.maven.its.mng4283</groupId>
  <artifactId>parent</artifactId>
  <version>0.1</version>
  <!-- NOTE: Any packaging other than "pom" must be rejected for a parent POM -->
  <packaging>jar</packaging>

  <name>Maven Integration Test :: MNG-4283</name>
  <description>
    Test that the model builder fails when a parent POM has not "pom" packaging.
  </description>

  <version>9999.0-empty-to-avoid-conflict-with-guava</version>
  <name>Guava ListenableFuture only</name>
  <description>
    An empty artifact that Guava depends on to signal that it is providing
    ListenableFuture -- but is also available in a second "version" that
    contains com.google.common.util.concurrent.ListenableFuture class, without
    any other Guava classes. The idea is:

  <description>
    Test that plugin executions are properly merged during inheritance, even if the child uses a different
    plugin version than the parent.
  </description>

  <build>
    <plugins>
      <plugin>
        <groupId>org.apache.maven.its.plugins</groupId>
        <artifactId>maven-it-plugin-a</artifactId>
        <!-- NOTE: Use different version than child -->
        <version>1.0</version>

</source>

<!--
    We used to set this only for packages that had manual supersource. That
    worked everywhere that I know of except for one place: when running the GWT
    util.concurrent tests under Guava.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see https://goo.gl/pRV3Yn for details.

    The summary is that it ignores one file in favor of the other.

</source>

<!--
    We used to set this only for packages that had manual supersource. That
    worked everywhere that I know of except for one place: when running the GWT
    util.concurrent tests under Guava.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see https://goo.gl/pRV3Yn for details.

    The summary is that it ignores one file in favor of the other.

</source>

<!--
    We used to set this only for packages that had manual supersource. That
    worked everywhere that I know of except for one place: when running the GWT
    util.concurrent tests under Guava.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see https://goo.gl/pRV3Yn for details.

    The summary is that it ignores one file in favor of the other.

specific language governing permissions and limitations
under the License.
-->

<project>
    <modelVersion>4.999.999</modelVersion>
    <!-- this should be a fake "future" version that only has modelVersion understood by us -->
    <coordinates>tests.project:future-model-version</coordinates>

    <!--
      | We may potentially want to export these, but right now I'm not sure that anything Guice specific needs
      | to be made available to plugin authors. If we find people are getting fancy and want to take advantage of
      | Guice specifics we can expose that later. Really some testing needs to be done to see full hiding

  <groupId>org.apache.maven.its.mng4193</groupId>
  <artifactId>test</artifactId>
  <version>0.1</version>
  <packaging>jar</packaging>

  <name>Maven Integration Test :: MNG-4193</name>
  <description>
    Test that multiple plugin repository declarations with the same id cause a validation error.
  </description>

  <pluginRepositories>
    <pluginRepository>
      <id>one</id>
      <url>https://repo1.maven.org/maven2</url>