void tryClose() {
        synchronized( LOCK ) {

            /* Yes, there is the potential to drop packets
             * because we might close the socket during a
             * request. However the chances are slim and the
             * retry code should ensure the overall request
             * is serviced. The alternative complicates things
             * more than I think is worth it.
             */

    try {
      japaneseToSpanish.apply("Ni");
      fail();
    } catch (IllegalArgumentException e) {
    }
    assertEquals("Tres", japaneseToSpanish.apply("San"));
    try {
      japaneseToSpanish.apply("Shi");
      fail();
    } catch (IllegalArgumentException e) {
    }

    new EqualsTester()
        .addEqualityGroup(japaneseToSpanish, Functions.compose(integerToSpanish, japaneseToInteger))

    try {
      japaneseToSpanish.apply("Ni");
      fail();
    } catch (IllegalArgumentException e) {
    }
    assertEquals("Tres", japaneseToSpanish.apply("San"));
    try {
      japaneseToSpanish.apply("Shi");
      fail();
    } catch (IllegalArgumentException e) {
    }

    new EqualsTester()
        .addEqualityGroup(japaneseToSpanish, Functions.compose(integerToSpanish, japaneseToInteger))

 * <p>This class uses (possibly repeated) invocations of {@link java.lang.System#gc()} to cause
 * finalization to happen. However, a call to {@code System.gc()} is specified to be no more than a
 * hint, so this technique may fail at the whim of the JDK implementation, for example if a user
 * specified the JVM flag {@code -XX:+DisableExplicitGC}. But in practice, it works very well for
 * ordinary tests.
 *

FB2A          ; mapped                 ; 05E9 05C1     # 1.1  HEBREW LETTER SHIN WITH SHIN DOT
FB2B          ; mapped                 ; 05E9 05C2     # 1.1  HEBREW LETTER SHIN WITH SIN DOT
FB2C          ; mapped                 ; 05E9 05BC 05C1 #1.1  HEBREW LETTER SHIN WITH DAGESH AND SHIN DOT
FB2D          ; mapped                 ; 05E9 05BC 05C2 #1.1  HEBREW LETTER SHIN WITH DAGESH AND SIN DOT

annas?esnonihs??o&gasa!kat??ka?n&ikat?o?ustat??rihsay?sihs?tomus?yas??u&bay?gnihs?????hih,konip,l&bs,ik,?mol,nagan!.&a&bukah?d&a&w?yim??e&ki?u??ii??k&a&s&ay?uki??zus??ihsoo?ousay??m&ay&akat?ii??i&hsukufosik?jii??ukihc??n&i!hsetat??uzii??r&ah?ugot??saim?t&agamay?oyim??w&a&g&a&kan?n??o??kustam?ziurak??onim!imanim??u&koo?s!omihs????ya&ko?rih???e&akas?nagamok?subo??i&gakat?h&asa?c&a!mo!nanihs???uonamay??sukagot??k&a&kas?mimanim?to??ia&atik?imanim??oa?uzihcom??m&akawak?ijuf?o!t???r&ato?ijoihs?omakat?...

        synchronized ( this.LOCK ) {

            /*
             * Yes, there is the potential to drop packets
             * because we might close the socket during a
             * request. However the chances are slim and the
             * retry code should ensure the overall request
             * is serviced. The alternative complicates things
             * more than I think is worth it.
             */

build:ios_armv7 --config=ios
build:ios_armv7 --cpu=ios_armv7
build:ios_arm64 --config=ios
build:ios_arm64 --cpu=ios_arm64
build:ios_arm64e --config=ios
build:ios_arm64e --cpu=ios_arm64e
build:ios_sim_arm64 --config=ios
build:ios_sim_arm64 --cpu=ios_sim_arm64
build:ios_x86_64 --config=ios
build:ios_x86_64 --cpu=ios_x86_64
build:ios_fat --config=ios
build:ios_fat --ios_multi_cpus=armv7,arm64,i386,x86_64

// for the first time.
TF_Library* TF_LoadPluggableDeviceLibrary(const char* library_filename,
                                          TF_Status* status) {
#if defined(IS_MOBILE_PLATFORM) || defined(IS_SLIM_BUILD)
  status->status = tensorflow::errors::Unimplemented(
      "PluggableDevice plugin functionality is not supported on mobile");
  return nullptr;
#else
  TF_Library* lib_handle = new TF_Library;

Então, para equilibrar tudo, imagine a seguinte historinha:

> Você tem que limpar uma grande casa suja.

*Sim, essa é toda a história*.

---

Não há espera em lugar algum, apenas um monte de trabalho para ser feito, em múltiplos cômodos da casa.