with:
        token: ${{ secrets.FASTAPI_LABEL_APPROVED }}
        config: >
          {
            "approved-1":
              {
                "number": 1,
                "await_label": "awaiting-review"
              }

name: Comment Docs Preview in PR
description: Comment with the docs URL preview in the PR
author: Sebastián Ramírez <******@****.***>
inputs:
  token:
    description: Token for the repo. Can be passed in using {{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
    required: true
  deploy_url:
    description: The deployment URL to comment in the PR
    required: true
runs:
  using: docker

        run: |
          go install mvdan.cc/gofumpt@v0.2.0
          gofumpt -e -d . | \

I (the author, [@tiangolo](https://twitter.com/tiangolo)) will review it thoroughly and get back to you.

## Public Discussions

Please restrain from publicly discussing a potential security vulnerability. 🙊

# See the OWNERS docs at https://go.k8s.io/owners

options:
  # make root approval non-recursive
  no_parent_owners: true
reviewers:
  - alisondy
  - cblecker
  - guineveresaenger
  - mrbobbytables
  - nikhita
  - parispittman
  - palnabarun
  - kaslin
  - MadhavJivrajani
  - Priyankasaggu11929
approvers:
  - sig-contributor-experience-approvers
  - parispittman
emeritus_approvers:
  - castrojo
  - Phillels

    /*
     * The entrySet() of ConcurrentHashMap, unlike that of other Map
     * implementations, supports add() under JDK8. This seems problematic, but I
     * didn't see that discussed in the review, which included many other
     * changes: http://goo.gl/okTTdr
     *
     * TODO(cpovirk): decide what the best long-term action here is: force users
     * to suppress (as we do now), stop testing entrySet().add() at all, make

    /*
     * The entrySet() of ConcurrentHashMap, unlike that of other Map
     * implementations, supports add() under JDK8. This seems problematic, but I
     * didn't see that discussed in the review, which included many other
     * changes: http://goo.gl/okTTdr
     *
     * TODO(cpovirk): decide what the best long-term action here is: force users
     * to suppress (as we do now), stop testing entrySet().add() at all, make

    <summary>👀 Full file preview</summary>

    ```Python
    {!> ../../../docs_src/separate_openapi_schemas/tutorial001_py310.py!}
    ```

    </details>

=== "Python 3.9+"

    ```Python hl_lines="16"
    {!> ../../../docs_src/separate_openapi_schemas/tutorial001_py39.py[ln:1-17]!}

    # Code below omitted 👇
    ```

    <details>
    <summary>👀 Full file preview</summary>

    ```Python

      - {{ is.formatting }}
    run:
      - action: add-label@v1
        args:
          label: 'a:chore'
      - action: approve@v1

  # Call out PRs that change the build script (and will be longer to checkout and review)
  label_build_script_change:
    if:
      - {{ ('misc_labels' | isEnabledAutomation(pr)) }}
      - {{ is.build_script_change }}
    run:
      - action: add-label@v1
        args:

  // +optional
  map<string, string> annotations = 2;

  // Namespace is the namespace the pod is being created in.
  // +optional
  optional string namespace = 3;
}

// ImageReviewStatus is the result of the review for the pod creation request.
message ImageReviewStatus {
  // Allowed indicates that all images were allowed to be run.
  optional bool allowed = 1;

  // Reason should be empty unless Allowed is false in which case it