*       performance reasons, without affecting most of your code.
 * </ul>
 *
 * <p>The one downside of {@code Stopwatch} relative to {@link System#nanoTime()} is that {@code
 * Stopwatch} requires object allocation and additional method calls, which can reduce the accuracy
 * of the elapsed times reported. {@code Stopwatch} is still suitable for logging and metrics where

    /**
     * 
     * @return whether the server has singing enabled
     */
    boolean isSigningEnabled ();


    /**
     * 
     * @return whether the server requires signing
     */
    boolean isSigningRequired ();


    /**
     * @return whether the server supports DFS
     */
    boolean isDFSSupported ();


    /**
     * @param request
     */

    // corresponding Comparable wrapper in java.lang.
    for (int i = 0; i < VALUES.length; i++) {
      for (int j = 0; j < VALUES.length; j++) {
        byte x = VALUES[i];
        byte y = VALUES[j];
        // note: spec requires only that the sign is the same
        assertWithMessage(x + ", " + y)
            .that(Math.signum(Ints.compare(i, j)))
            .isEqualTo(Math.signum(UnsignedBytes.compare(x, y)));
      }
    }
  }

                pkill(pid);
            });
        }
    }

    private static void initExecutionMode(String[] args) {
        if (args.length != 1) {
            throw new IllegalArgumentException("Requires 1 param: " + Stream.of(ExecutionMode.values()).map(ExecutionMode::toString).collect(Collectors.joining("/")));
        }
        executionMode = ExecutionMode.valueOf(args[0]);

   * WritableByteChannel)}:
   *
   * <ol>
   *   <li>Use sendfile(2) or equivalent. Requires that both the input channel and the output
   *       channel have their own file descriptors. Generally this only happens when both channels
   *       are files or sockets. This performs zero copies - the bytes never enter userspace.
   *   <li>Use mmap(2) or equivalent. Requires that either the input channel or the output channel

    /*
     * No mutable Table exactly matches the insertion order behavior of ImmutableTable.Builder, but
     * the Builder can't efficiently support merging of duplicate values.  Getting around this
     * requires some work.
     */

    return Collector.of(
        ImmutableTableCollectorState<R, C, V>::new,
        (state, input) ->
            state.put(
                rowFunction.apply(input),

 *       performance reasons, without affecting most of your code.
 * </ul>
 *
 * <p>The one downside of {@code Stopwatch} relative to {@link System#nanoTime()} is that {@code
 * Stopwatch} requires object allocation and additional method calls, which can reduce the accuracy
 * of the elapsed times reported. {@code Stopwatch} is still suitable for logging and metrics where

         * technique that NTLMv2 specifically thwarts. A real NTLM Filter would
         * need to do a NETLOGON RPC that JCIFS will likely never implement
         * because it requires a lot of extra crypto not used by CIFS.
         */
        p.setProperty("jcifs.smb.lmCompatibility", "0");
        p.setProperty("jcifs.smb.client.useExtendedSecurity", "false");

      }
    }
    if (ipString.charAt(0) == IPV6_DELIMITER && ipString.charAt(1) != IPV6_DELIMITER) {
      return null; // ^: requires ^::
    }
    if (ipString.charAt(ipString.length() - 1) == IPV6_DELIMITER
        && ipString.charAt(ipString.length() - 2) != IPV6_DELIMITER) {
      return null; // :$ requires ::$
    }
    if (hasSkip && partsSkipped <= 0) {
      return null; // :: must expand to at least one '0'
    }

   * @param executor the executor that runs {@code fallback} if the input fails
   */
  @J2ktIncompatible
  @Partially.GwtIncompatible("AVAILABLE but requires exceptionType to be Throwable.class")
  public final <X extends Throwable> FluentFuture<V> catching(
      Class<X> exceptionType, Function<? super X, ? extends V> fallback, Executor executor) {