5. It sends the HTTP request and reads the response.

 files for the current project. if yes. then I'm able to find projects that
 can be offered to be opened together with the current project.
 problems with the current solution are:
 1. information is duplicate. once in POM's dependencies and once in the
 maven.multiproject.includes property.
 2. it works without problems only for projects with relative paths, e.g., from
 one CVS repository.. for projects from multiple SCM repositories it's harder

  traversing an object graph and extracting Object values, not just Strings.

* ComponentConfigurator

  Currently, the container uses BasicComponentConfigurator, to configure
  components. This wouldn't be a problem, except for the local instance of
  DefaultExpressionEvaluator used within. See the above discussion for more
  on why this evaluator is bad. We need to provide either an alternative

!!! tip
    Integrating other authentication/authorization providers like Google, Facebook, Twitter, GitHub, etc. is also possible and relatively easy.

    The most complex problem is building an authentication/authorization provider like those, but **FastAPI** gives you the tools to do it easily, while doing the heavy lifting for you.

## **FastAPI** utilities

    // IDE tries to acquire its bytecode via the index, however,
    // the index doesn't cover classfiles from compiler output,
    // so the lowering fails.
    //
    // To solve the problem, we need to find all delegated properties with inline accessors
    // reachable from files that will be compiled, and include files these inline accessors

            // Nevertheless, a `KtFirAnalysisSession`'s validity is based on the underlying `LLFirSession`, so removed analysis sessions for
            // library modules might still be valid. This is not a problem, though, because analysis session caching is not required for
            // correctness, but rather a performance optimization.
            analysisSessionProvider.clearCaches()
        }
    }
}

Özellikle, (diğer birçok araç arasında) Uvicorn, Starlette ve FastAPI'ın birlikte karşılaştırıldığını görebilirsiniz.

Aracın çözdüğü problem ne kadar basitse, performansı o kadar iyi olacaktır. Ancak kıyaslamaların çoğu, aracın sağladığı ek özellikleri test etmez.

Hiyerarşi şöyledir:

* **Uvicorn**: bir ASGI sunucusu

    required: true

-   type: textarea id: code-to-reproduce attributes: label: Standalone code to
    reproduce the issue description: Provide a reproducible test case that is
    the bare minimum necessary to generate the problem. If possible, please
    share a link to Colab/Jupyter/any notebook. placeholder: Tell us what you
    see! value: render: shell validations: required: true

     *
     * If the host platform is compromised or misconfigured this may contain untrustworthy root
     * certificates. Applications that connect to a known set of servers may be able to mitigate
     * this problem with [certificate pinning][CertificatePinner].
     */
    fun addPlatformTrustedCertificates() =
      apply {
        val platformTrustManager = Platform.get().platformTrustManager()

Konkret geht es darum, Uvicorn, Starlette und FastAPI miteinander zu vergleichen (neben vielen anderen Tools).

Je einfacher das Problem, welches durch das Tool gelöst wird, desto besser ist die Performanz. Und die meisten Benchmarks testen nicht die zusätzlichen Funktionen, welche das Tool bietet.

Die Hierarchie ist wie folgt:

* **Uvicorn**: ein ASGI-Server