*/
    public static <T> Result<T> newResult(T model, Iterable<? extends ModelProblem> problems) {
        return new Result<>(hasErrors(problems), model, problems);
    }

    /**
     * New result consisting of given result and new problem. Convenience for newResult(result.get(),
     * concat(result.getProblems(),problems)).
     *
     * @param result
     * @param problem
     */

</source>

<!--
    We used to set this only for packages that had manual supersource. That
    worked everywhere that I know of except for one place: when running the GWT
    util.concurrent tests under Guava.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see https://goo.gl/pRV3Yn for details.

    The summary is that it ignores one file in favor of the other.

</source>

<!--
    We used to set this only for packages that had manual supersource. That
    worked everywhere that I know of except for one place: when running the GWT
    util.concurrent tests under Guava.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see https://goo.gl/pRV3Yn for details.

    The summary is that it ignores one file in favor of the other.

      value: |
        Thanks for your interest in FastAPI! 🚀

        Please follow these instructions, fill every question, and do every step. 🙏

        I'm asking this because answering questions and solving problems in GitHub is what consumes most of the time.

        I end up not being able to add new features, fix bugs, review pull requests, etc. as fast as I wish because I have to spend too much time handling questions.

     * @return The formatted problem location or an empty string if unknown, never {@code null}.
     */
    public static String formatLocation(ModelProblem problem, String projectId) {
        StringBuilder buffer = new StringBuilder(256);

        if (!problem.getModelId().equals(projectId)) {
            buffer.append(problem.getModelId());
            if (!problem.getSource().isEmpty()) {

                    return defaultModelBuilder.readRawModel(req, problems);
                } catch (ModelBuilderException e) {
                    // gathered with problem collector
                }
                return null;
            }
        };
    }

    private boolean addEdge(Path from, Path p, DefaultModelProblemCollector problems) {
        try {
            dag.addEdge(from.toString(), p.toString());

  * Upgrade Node Problem Detector to v0.4.1. New features added:

    * Add /dev/kmsg support for kernel log parsing. ([#112](https://github.com/kubernetes/node-problem-detector/pull/112), [@euank](https://github.com/euank))

    * Add ABRT support. ([#105](https://github.com/kubernetes/node-problem-detector/pull/105), [@juliusmilan](https://github.com/juliusmilan))

- github.com/prometheus/common: [v0.4.1 → v0.10.0](https://github.com/prometheus/common/compare/v0.4.1...v0.10.0)
- github.com/prometheus/procfs: [v0.0.2 → v0.1.3](https://github.com/prometheus/procfs/compare/v0.0.2...v0.1.3)
- github.com/rubiojr/go-vhd: [0bfd3b3 → 02e2102](https://github.com/rubiojr/go-vhd/compare/0bfd3b3...02e2102)

from typing import Dict


def process_items(prices: Dict[str, float]):
    for item_name, item_price in prices.items():
        print(item_name)

This is still true.

So, to be able to have **multiple processes** at the same time, there has to be a **single process listening on a port** that then transmits the communication to each worker process in some way.

### Memory per Process