import java.lang.annotation.Retention;
import java.lang.annotation.RetentionPolicy;
import java.lang.annotation.Target;

/**
 * Outer class that exists solely to let us write {@code Partially.GwtIncompatible} instead of plain
 * {@code GwtIncompatible}. This is more accurate for {@link Futures#catching}, which is available
 * under GWT but with a slightly different signature.
 *

 * applies first-in-first-out tie-breaking to comparable elements. To use it, you would insert a
 * {@code new FIFOEntry(anEntry)} instead of a plain entry object.
 *
 * <pre>
 * class FIFOEntry&lt;E extends Comparable&lt;? super E&gt;&gt;
 *     implements Comparable&lt;FIFOEntry&lt;E&gt;&gt; {
 *   final static AtomicLong seq = new AtomicLong();

    return delegate().get(key, valueLoader);
  }

  /** @since 11.0 */
  @Override
  /*
   * <? extends Object> is mostly the same as <?> to plain Java. But to nullness checkers, they
   * differ: <? extends Object> means "non-null types," while <?> means "all types."
   */
  public ImmutableMap<K, V> getAllPresent(Iterable<? extends Object> keys) {

    return delegate().get(key, valueLoader);
  }

  /** @since 11.0 */
  @Override
  /*
   * <? extends Object> is mostly the same as <?> to plain Java. But to nullness checkers, they
   * differ: <? extends Object> means "non-null types," while <?> means "all types."
   */
  public ImmutableMap<K, V> getAllPresent(Iterable<? extends Object> keys) {

wandered about in the wood, `is to grow to my right size again;
and the second thing is to find my way into that lovely garden.
I think that will be the best plan.'

  It sounded an excellent plan, no doubt, and very neatly and
simply arranged; the only difficulty was, that she had not the
smallest idea how to set about it; and while she was peering

     *
     * 1. We'll want to use something like @PolyNull once we can make that work for the various
     * platforms we target.
     *
     * 2. Kotlin's Map type has a getOrDefault method that accepts and returns a "plain V," in
     * contrast to the "V?" type that we're using. As a result, Kotlin sees a conflict between the
     * nullness annotations in ImmutableMap and those in its own Map type. In response, it considers

  }

  /*
   * Tests that we workaround GWT bug #3621 (or that it is already fixed).
   *
   * A call to of() with a parameter that is not a plain Object[] (here,
   * Interface[]) creates a RegularImmutableSortedSet backed by an array of that
   * type. Later, RegularImmutableSortedSet.toArray() calls System.arraycopy()

   * backing sets do. Contains methods to copy the data into a new set which will then remain
   * stable. There is usually no reason to retain a reference of type {@code SetView}; typically,
   * you either use it as a plain {@link Set}, or immediately invoke {@link #immutableCopy} or
   * {@link #copyInto} and forget the {@code SetView} itself.
   *
   * @since 2.0
   */

   * X> if we support such a thing? It would be weird or misleading for users to be able to pass
   * `new TypeParameter<@Nullable T>() {}` and have it act as a plain `TypeParameter<T>`, but
   * hopefully no one would do that, anyway. See also the comment on TypeParameter itself.
   *
   * TODO(cpovirk): Elaborate on this / merge with other comment?
   */

   * possible with an unsafe cast which requires {@code keys} to actually be of type {@code K}.
   *
   * @since 11.0
   */
  /*
   * <? extends Object> is mostly the same as <?> to plain Java. But to nullness checkers, they
   * differ: <? extends Object> means "non-null types," while <?> means "all types."
   */
  @Override
  public ImmutableMap<K, V> getAllPresent(Iterable<? extends Object> keys) {