label: Actual Behavior
      description: What actually happened?
    validations:
      required: true

  - type: dropdown
    attributes:
      label: Packages
      description: If this issue is package-specific, then please select the relevant packages.
      multiple: true
      options:
        - com.google.common.annotations
        - com.google.common.base
        - com.google.common.cache

 * {@link Escaper}.
 *
 * <p>Additional escapers implementations are found in the applicable packages: {@link
 * com.google.common.html.HtmlEscapers} in {@code com.google.common.html}, {@link
 * com.google.common.xml.XmlEscapers} in {@code com.google.common.xml}, and {@link
 * com.google.common.net.UrlEscapers} in {@code com.google.common.net}.
 *
 * <p>This package is a part of the open-source <a href="https://github.com/google/guava">Guava</a>
 * library.

import java.lang.reflect.Method;
import junit.framework.TestCase;

/**
 * Tests that all package-private {@code writeReplace} methods are overridden in any existing
 * subclasses. Without such overrides, optimizers might put a {@code writeReplace}-containing class
 * and its subclass in different packages, causing the serialization system to fail to invoke {@code

import java.lang.reflect.Method;
import junit.framework.TestCase;

/**
 * Tests that all package-private {@code writeReplace} methods are overridden in any existing
 * subclasses. Without such overrides, optimizers might put a {@code writeReplace}-containing class
 * and its subclass in different packages, causing the serialization system to fail to invoke {@code

    for prod and one for tests. However, unlike our other packages, as of this
    writing it has test supersource but no prod supersource.

    GWT happens to use the prod .gwt.xml, so it looks for no supersource for
    tests, either. This causes it to fail to find AtomicLongMapTest.

    Our workaround is to tell GWT that util.concurrent and all other packages

    for prod and one for tests. However, unlike our other packages, as of this
    writing it has test supersource but no prod supersource.

    GWT happens to use the prod .gwt.xml, so it looks for no supersource for
    tests, either. This causes it to fail to find AtomicLongMapTest.

    Our workaround is to tell GWT that util.concurrent and all other packages

    for prod and one for tests. However, unlike our other packages, as of this
    writing it has test supersource but no prod supersource.

    GWT happens to use the prod .gwt.xml, so it looks for no supersource for
    tests, either. This causes it to fail to find AtomicLongMapTest.

    Our workaround is to tell GWT that util.concurrent and all other packages

      description: Please provide use cases that actually came up in the real world.
    validations:
      required: true

  - type: dropdown
    attributes:
      label: Packages
      description: Please select all of the packages that are relevant to this feature request.
      multiple: true
      options:
        - com.google.common.annotations
        - com.google.common.base
        - com.google.common.cache

          </execution>
        </executions>
        <configuration>
          <instructions>
            <Export-Package>
              !com.google.common.base.internal,
              !com.google.common.util.concurrent.internal,
              com.google.common.*
            </Export-Package>
            <Import-Package>
              com.google.common.util.concurrent.internal,
              javax.annotation;resolution:=optional,

    } catch (Throwable t) {
      /*
       * This is not one of AppEngine's allowed classes, so even in Sun JDKs, this can fail with
       * a NoClassDefFoundError. Other apps might deny access to sun.misc packages.
       */
      return null;
    }
  }

  /**
   * Returns the Method that can be used to resolve an individual StackTraceElement, or null if that