},
		{ // case 2: supplying nonexistent pod name should result in error with flag
			args:          strings.Split("deployment/random-gibberish", " "),
			wantException: true,
		},
		{ // case 3: supplying nonexistent deployment name
			args:          strings.Split("deployment/random-gibberish.default", " "),
			wantException: true,
		},
		{ // case 4: supplying nonexistent deployment name in nonexistent namespace

def test_app():
    from docs_src.app_testing.app_b_an_py310 import test_main

    test_main.test_create_existing_item()
    test_main.test_create_item()
    test_main.test_create_item_bad_token()
    test_main.test_read_nonexistent_item()
    test_main.test_read_item()

from docs_src.app_testing.app_b_an import test_main


def test_app():
    test_main.test_create_existing_item()
    test_main.test_create_item()
    test_main.test_create_item_bad_token()
    test_main.test_read_nonexistent_item()
    test_main.test_read_item()

    Our workaround is to tell GWT that util.concurrent and all other packages
    have prod supersource, even if they have none. GWT is happy to ignore us
    when we specify a nonexistent path.

    (I hope that this workaround does not cause its own problems in the future.)
-->
<super-source path="super"/>

<inherits name="com.google.gwt.core.Core" />
<inherits name="com.google.gwt.user.User" />

    Our workaround is to tell GWT that util.concurrent and all other packages
    have prod supersource, even if they have none. GWT is happy to ignore us
    when we specify a nonexistent path.

    (I hope that this workaround does not cause its own problems in the future.)
-->
<super-source path="super"/>

<inherits name="com.google.common.annotations.Annotations" />

    Our workaround is to tell GWT that util.concurrent and all other packages
    have prod supersource, even if they have none. GWT is happy to ignore us
    when we specify a nonexistent path.

    (I hope that this workaround does not cause its own problems in the future.)
-->
<super-source path="super"/>

<inherits name="com.google.common.annotations.Annotations" />

    Our workaround is to tell GWT that util.concurrent and all other packages
    have prod supersource, even if they have none. GWT is happy to ignore us
    when we specify a nonexistent path.

    (I hope that this workaround does not cause its own problems in the future.)
-->
<super-source path="super"/>

<inherits name="com.google.common.annotations.Annotations" />

    Our workaround is to tell GWT that util.concurrent and all other packages
    have prod supersource, even if they have none. GWT is happy to ignore us
    when we specify a nonexistent path.

    (I hope that this workaround does not cause its own problems in the future.)
-->
<super-source path="super"/>

<inherits name="com.google.common.annotations.Annotations" />

    Our workaround is to tell GWT that util.concurrent and all other packages
    have prod supersource, even if they have none. GWT is happy to ignore us
    when we specify a nonexistent path.

    (I hope that this workaround does not cause its own problems in the future.)
-->
<super-source path="super"/>

<inherits name="com.google.common.annotations.Annotations" />

@needs_py310
def test_app():
    from docs_src.app_testing.app_b_py310 import test_main

    test_main.test_create_existing_item()
    test_main.test_create_item()
    test_main.test_create_item_bad_token()
    test_main.test_read_nonexistent_item()
    test_main.test_read_item()