* <p>It should be noted that using a {@code Striped<L>} with relatively few stripes, and {@code
   * bulkGet(keys)} with a relative large number of keys can cause an excessive number of shared
   * stripes (much like the birthday paradox, where much fewer than anticipated birthdays are needed
   * for a pair of them to match). Please consider carefully the implications of the number of

 *
 * <p>Unlike {@code java.util.HashSet}, iteration is only proportional to the actual {@code size()},
 * which is optimal, and <i>not</i> the size of the internal hashtable, which could be much larger
 * than {@code size()}. Furthermore, this structure only depends on a fixed number of arrays; {@code
 * add(x)} operations <i>do not</i> create objects for the garbage collector to deal with, and for

   * we've chosen to instead use a signature that benefits existing users -- and is still safe.
   *
   * For convertAll, I haven't looked as closely at *how* much existing users benefit, so we should
   * keep an eye out for problems that new users encounter. Note also that convertAll could support
   * both use cases by using @PolyNull. (By contrast, we can't use @PolyNull for our superinterface

    assert response.status_code == 200, response.text
    assert response.json() == data


def test_model_with_tuple_invalid():
    data = {"items": [["foo", "bar"], ["baz", "whatelse", "too", "much"]]}
    response = client.post("/model-with-tuple/", json=data)
    assert response.status_code == 422, response.text

    data = {"items": [["foo", "bar"], ["baz"]]}
    response = client.post("/model-with-tuple/", json=data)

         * We don't *need* to use reflection to access Optional: It's available on all JDKs we
         * support, and Android code won't get this far, anyway, because ProcessHandle is
         * unavailable. But given how much other reflection we're using, we might as well use it
         * here, too, so that we don't need to also suppress an AndroidApiChecker error.
         */

            assertTrue(scheduler.containsKey("running"));
            isRunning = (Boolean) scheduler.get("running");

        }
        if (300 <= count) {
            logger.info("Time out: Crawler takes too much time");
            //TODO fail(); // Time Out
        }

        logger.info("Crawler terminated");
    }

    protected static String createWebConfig(final Map<String, Object> requestBody) {

   * ImmutableList.copyOf} and use that list instead.
   */
  public List<Double> asList() {
    /*
     * Typically we cache this kind of thing, but much repeated use of this view is a performance
     * anti-pattern anyway. If we cache, then everyone pays a price in memory footprint even if
     * they never use this method.
     */
    return new AsList(this);
  }

---

If you just don't know, use normal `def`.

---

**Note**: You can mix `def` and `async def` in your *path operation functions* as much as you need and define each one using the best option for you. FastAPI will do the right thing with them.

Anyway, in any of the cases above, FastAPI will still work asynchronously and be extremely fast.

  /**
   * This strategy uses all 128 bits of {@link Hashing#murmur3_128} when hashing. It looks different
   * from the implementation in MURMUR128_MITZ_32 because we're avoiding the multiplication in the
   * loop and doing a (much simpler) += hash2. We're also changing the index to a positive number by
   * AND'ing with Long.MAX_VALUE instead of flipping the bits.
   */
  MURMUR128_MITZ_64() {
    @Override

   * to reduce cache contention on most processors. Padding is
   * overkill for most Atomics because they are usually irregularly
   * scattered in memory and thus don't interfere much with each
   * other. But Atomic objects residing in arrays will tend to be
   * placed adjacent to each other, and so will most often share
   * cache lines (with a huge negative performance impact) without
   * this precaution.