// the output, so the input must be at least 32 bits, since the output has to be that long
    assertPutString(new char[] {'p', HashTestUtils.randomLowSurrogate(new Random())});
  }

  public void testPutStringWithHighSurrogate() {
    // we pad because the dummy hash function we use to test this, merely copies the input into
    // the output, so the input must be at least 32 bits, since the output has to be that long

   */
  public abstract long asLong();

  /**
   * If this hashcode has enough bits, returns {@code asLong()}, otherwise returns a {@code long}
   * value with {@code asBytes()} as the least-significant bytes and {@code 0x00} as the remaining
   * most-significant bytes.
   *
   * @since 14.0 (since 11.0 as {@code Hashing.padToLong(HashCode)})
   */
  public abstract long padToLong();

  /**

     * anything interesting under most environments. Still, we can run it (except for Android, at
     * least old versions), so we mostly do. This is useful because we don't actually run our CI on
     * Windows under Java 8, at least as of this writing.
     *
     * Under Windows in particular, we want to test that:
     *

    List<char[]> ordered =
        Arrays.asList(
            new char[] {},
            new char[] {LEAST},
            new char[] {LEAST, LEAST},
            new char[] {LEAST, (char) 1},
            new char[] {(char) 1},
            new char[] {(char) 1, LEAST},
            new char[] {GREATEST, GREATEST - (char) 1},
            new char[] {GREATEST, GREATEST},

    /**
     * 
     */
    public static final byte SMB2_OPLOCK_LEVEL_BATCH = 0x9;
    /**
     * 
     */
    public static final byte SMB2_OPLOCK_LEVEL_LEASE = (byte) 0xFF;

    /**
     * 
     */
    public static final int SMB2_IMPERSONATION_LEVEL_ANONYMOUS = 0x0;

    /**
     * 
     */

  static <T extends @Nullable Object> Collector<T, ?, List<T>> least(
      int k, Comparator<? super T> comparator) {
    checkNonnegative(k, "k");
    checkNotNull(comparator);
    return Collector.of(
        () -> TopKSelector.<T>least(k, comparator),
        TopKSelector::offer,
        TopKSelector::combine,
        TopKSelector::topK,

 *       AndroidIncompatible}. But I'm not sure what would happen if we annotated the {@code
 *       suite()} method with {@code Suppress}. Would {@code FooTest} itself be suppressed, too?
 *   <li>In at least one case, a use of {@code sun.misc.FpUtils}, the test will not even
 *       <i>compile</i> against Android. Now, this might be an artifact of our build system, one

// at least one member of verbs matches the request, (b) at least one
// member of apiGroups matches the request, (c) at least one member of
// resources matches the request, and (d) either (d1) the request does
// not specify a namespace (i.e., `Namespace==""`) and clusterScope is
// true or (d2) the request specifies a namespace and least one member
// of namespaces matches the request's namespace.

// at least one member of verbs matches the request, (b) at least one
// member of apiGroups matches the request, (c) at least one member of
// resources matches the request, and (d) either (d1) the request does
// not specify a namespace (i.e., `Namespace==""`) and clusterScope is
// true or (d2) the request specifies a namespace and least one member
// of namespaces matches the request's namespace.

  // daemon pod and have one or more of the daemon pod running and
  // available (ready for at least spec.minReadySeconds)
  // +optional
  optional int32 numberAvailable = 7;

  // The number of nodes that should be running the
  // daemon pod and have none of the daemon pod running and available
  // (ready for at least spec.minReadySeconds)
  // +optional
  optional int32 numberUnavailable = 8;