tearDownStack.runTearDown();
  }

  /**
   * This first test doesn't test anything in Uninterruptibles, just demonstrates some normal
   * behavior of futures so that you can contrast the next test with it.
   */
  public void testRegularFutureInterrupted() throws ExecutionException {

    /*
     * Here's the order of events that we want.
     *
     * 1. The client thread begins to block on a get() call to a future.

import java.util.logging.Logger;

/**
 * Simple utility for when you want to create a {@link TearDown} that may throw an exception but
 * should not fail a test when it does. (The behavior of a {@code TearDown} that throws an exception
 * varies; see its documentation for details.) Use it just like a {@code TearDown}, except override
 * {@link #sloppyTearDown()} instead.
 *
 * @author Luiz-Otavio Zorzella
 * @since 10.0
 */
@GwtCompatible

/**
 * Annotates a program element that exists, or is more widely visible than otherwise necessary, only
 * for use in test code.
 *
 * <p><b>Do not use this interface</b> for public or protected declarations: it is a fig leaf for
 * bad design, and it does not prevent anyone from using the declaration---and experience has shown
 * that they will. If the method breaks the encapsulation of its class, then its internal

 * @author Louis Wasserman
 */
public class OutsideEventBusTest extends TestCase {

  /*
   * If you do this test from common.eventbus.EventBusTest, it doesn't actually test the behavior.
   * That is, even if exactly the same method works from inside the common.eventbus package tests,
   * it can fail here.
   */
  public void testAnonymous() {
    final AtomicReference<String> holder = new AtomicReference<>();

   * does not include "was cancelled." To be explicit: If this method returns a non-null value,
   * then:
   *
   * <ul>
   *   <li>{@code isDone()} must return {@code true}
   *   <li>{@code isCancelled()} must return {@code false}
   *   <li>{@code get()} must not block, and it must throw an {@code ExecutionException} with the

      /*
       * The following call is not statically checked, since arraycopy accepts plain Object for its
       * parameters. If it were statically checked, the checker would still be OK with it, since
       * we're copying into a `contents` array whose type allows it to contain nulls. Still, it's
       * worth noting that we promise not to put nulls into the array in the first `size` elements.

   * a lock's behavior when detecting a cyclic lock acquisition is defined by the {@code Policy} of
   * the factory that created it.
   *
   * <p>Note, however, that although multiple locks can be created for a given Enum value, whether
   * it be through separate factory instances or through multiple calls to the same factory,

    if (index >= 0) {
      return inclusive ? index : index + 1;
    } else {
      return ~index;
    }
  }

  // Pretend the comparator can compare anything. If it turns out it can't
  // compare two elements, it'll throw a CCE. Only methods that are specified to
  // throw CCE should call this.
  @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
  Comparator<Object> unsafeComparator() {

            + Long.numberOfLeadingZeros(~a)
            + Long.numberOfLeadingZeros(b)
            + Long.numberOfLeadingZeros(~b);
    /*
     * If leadingZeros > Long.SIZE + 1 it's definitely fine, if it's < Long.SIZE it's definitely
     * bad. We do the leadingZeros check to avoid the division below if at all possible.
     *
     * Otherwise, if b == Long.MIN_VALUE, then the only allowed values of a are 0 and 1. We take

 * parameter for non-GWT, non-test files, and it didn't seem worth adding one for this unusual case.
 */
@GwtCompatible(emulated = true)
final class LenientSerializableTester {
  /*
   * TODO(cpovirk): move this to c.g.c.testing if we allow for c.g.c.annotations dependencies so
   * that it can be GWTified?
   */
  @CanIgnoreReturnValue
  @GwtIncompatible // SerializableTester