- Improved handling of jsonpath expressions for `kubectl wait --for`. It is now possible to use simple filter expressions which match on a field's content. ([#118748](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/118748), [@andreaskaris](https://github.com/andreaskaris))

    public static final List<String> VALID_MODEL_VERSIONS =
            Collections.unmodifiableList(Arrays.asList("4.0.0", "4.1.0"));

    private static final Pattern EXPRESSION_NAME_PATTERN = Pattern.compile("\\$\\{(.+?)}");
    private static final Pattern EXPRESSION_PROJECT_NAME_PATTERN = Pattern.compile("\\$\\{(project.+?)}");

    private static final String ILLEGAL_FS_CHARS = "\\/:\"<>|?*";

def get_sequential_burgers(number: int):
    # Do some sequential stuff to create the burgers
    return burgers
```

With `async def`, Python knows that, inside that function, it has to be aware of `await` expressions, and that it can "pause" ⏸ the execution of that function and go do something else 🔀 before coming back.

When you want to call an `async def` function, you have to "await" it. So, this won't work:

```Python

def get_sequential_burgers(number: int):
    # Opérations asynchrones pour créer les burgers
    return burgers
```

Avec `async def`, Python sait que dans cette fonction il doit prendre en compte les expressions `await`, et qu'il peut mettre en pause ⏸ l'exécution de la fonction pour aller faire autre chose 🔀 avant de revenir.

Pour appeler une fonction définie avec `async def`, vous devez utiliser `await`. Donc ceci ne marche pas :

- The "value" part in the `wait --for=jsonpath='{expression}'[=value]` is now
  optional. If the value is not provided i.e., the command looks like `wait --for=jsonpath='{expression}'`
  then the wait condition is interpreted as matched when the expression returns

 * instance, but has the chance to act on values <i>before</i> handing off to that backing instance.
 * As a result, it usually helps to read chained ordering expressions <i>backwards</i>. For example,
 * when {@code compare} is called on the above ordering:
 *
 * <ol>
 *   <li>First, if only one {@code Foo} is null, that null value is treated as <i>greater</i>

defined as the partial order requirements set out by the <a href="/ref/spec">Go language specification</a>
for Go's control flow constructs as well as the <a href="/ref/spec#Order_of_evaluation">order of evaluation for expressions</a>.
</p>

<p>
A Go <i>program execution</i> is modeled as a set of goroutine executions,
together with a mapping <i>W</i> that specifies the write-like operation that each read-like operation reads from.

		p.errorf("expected g or R0 through R15; found %s", name)
		return 0
	}
	return uint16(reg)
}

// Note: There are two changes in the expression handling here
// compared to the old yacc/C implementations. Neither has
// much practical consequence because the expressions we
// see in assembly code are simple, but for the record:
//
// 1) Evaluation uses uint64; the old one used int64.

- Added authorization check support to the CEL expressions of ValidatingAdmissionPolicy via a `authorizer`

    // that represent a verification of a specification item needs to be a couple lines at most.
    // The expressions help a lot, but we need a clean to pick up a directory of POMs, automatically load
    // them into a resolver, create the expression to extract the data to validate the Model, and the URI
    // to validate the properties. We also need a way to navigate from the Tex specification documents to