* for interprocess communication.
 *
 * <h2>Receiving Events</h2>
 *
 * <p>To receive events, an object should:
 *
 * <ol>
 *   <li>Expose a public method, known as the <i>event subscriber</i>, which accepts a single
 *       argument of the type of event desired;
 *   <li>Mark it with a {@link Subscribe} annotation;

    try {
      ImmutableIntArray.builder(-1);
      fail();
    } catch (IllegalArgumentException expected) {
    }
  }

  /**
   * If there's a bug in builder growth, we wouldn't know how to expose it. So, brute force the hell
   * out of it for a while and see what happens.
   */
  public void testBuilder_bruteForce() {
    for (int i = 0; i < reduceIterationsIfGwt(100); i++) {

         * Lock to ensure that a task cannot be rescheduled while a cancel is ongoing.
         *
         * In theory, cancel() could execute arbitrary listeners -- bad to do while holding a lock.
         * However, we don't expose currentFuture to users, so they can't attach listeners. And the
         * Future might not even be a ListenableFuture, just a plain Future. That said, similar

 *       However, utilities that <i>use</i> that executor have the ability to interrupt tasks
 *       running on it. This class, by contrast, does not expose an {@code Executor} API.)
 * </ul>
 *
 * <p>If you don't need the features of this class, you may prefer {@code newSequentialExecutor} for
 * its simplicity and ability to accommodate interruption.
 *
 * @since 26.0

 * without changing the iterator's state, using the {@link #hasNext} method. But many data sources,
 * such as {@link java.io.Reader#read()}, do not expose this information; the only way to discover
 * whether there is any data left is by trying to retrieve it. These types of data sources are
 * ordinarily difficult to write iterators for. But using this class, one must implement only the

  /**
   * This test is for a case where two Service.Listener callbacks for the same service would call
   * transitionService in the wrong order due to a race. Due to the fact that it is a race this test
   * isn't guaranteed to expose the issue, but it is at least likely to become flaky if the race
   * sneaks back in, and in this case flaky means something is definitely wrong.
   *
   * <p>Before the bug was fixed this test would fail at least 30% of the time.

   */
  /*
   * TODO(cpovirk): Change to Comparator<? super B> to permit Comparator<@Nullable ...> and
   * Comparator<SupertypeOfB>? What we have here matches the immutable collections, but those also
   * expose a public Builder constructor that accepts "? super." So maybe we should do *that*
   * instead.
   */
  public static <B> Builder<B> orderedBy(Comparator<B> comparator) {
    return new Builder<>(comparator);
  }

 * it as a {@code GwtIncompatible} annotation. And for {@code Futures.catching}, we need the GWT
 * compiler to autostrip the normal server method in order to expose the special, inherited GWT
 * version.
 */
@GwtCompatible
@ElementTypesAreNonnullByDefault
final class Partially {
  /**

  }

  /**
   * Returns a {@link NetworkBuilder} initialized with all properties queryable from {@code
   * network}.
   *
   * <p>The "queryable" properties are those that are exposed through the {@link Network} interface,
   * such as {@link Network#isDirected()}. Other properties, such as {@link
   * #expectedNodeCount(int)}, are not set in the new builder.
   */

            </goals>
          </execution>
        </executions>
        <configuration>
          <instructions>
            <Export-Package>
              !com.google.common.base.internal,
              !com.google.common.util.concurrent.internal,
              com.google.common.*
            </Export-Package>
            <Import-Package>
              com.google.common.util.concurrent.internal,