or even industries — utilities useful for a sizable proportion of all Java programmers
        everywhere. If you can give enough detail such that any of us can imagine coming across
        a similar need in our own work, that's extremely helpful in studying how broadly useful the
        feature will be.

  - type: textarea
    attributes:
      label: Concrete Use Cases

#### Shared reader thread

We can't rely on application threads to read data from the socket. Application threads are transient: sometimes they're reading and writing and sometimes they're off doing application-layer things. But the socket is permanent, and it needs constant attention: we dispatch all incoming frames so the connection is good-to-go when the application layer needs it.

        That's a lot of work they are doing, but if more FastAPI users came to help others like them just a little bit more, it would be much less effort for them (and you and me 😅).

   * TODO(b/242884182): Figure out why this helps produce the same class file when we compile most
   * of common.collect a second time with the results of the first compilation on the classpath. Or
   * just back this out once we stop doing that (which we'll do after our internal GWT setup
   * changes).
   */
  @Override
  public ImmutableMap<Object, Collection<Object>> asMap() {
    return super.asMap();
  }

  private Object readResolve() {

   * TODO(b/242884182): Figure out why this helps produce the same class file when we compile most
   * of common.collect a second time with the results of the first compilation on the classpath. Or
   * just back this out once we stop doing that (which we'll do after our internal GWT setup
   * changes).
   */
  @Override
  public ImmutableMap<Object, Collection<Object>> asMap() {
    return super.asMap();
  }

  private Object readResolve() {

    thread.joinSuccessfully(LONG_DELAY_MS);
    assertInterrupted();
  }

  public void testJoinTimeoutMultiInterruptExpired() {
    /*
     * We don't "need" to schedule a thread completion at all here, but by doing
     * so, we come the closest we can to testing that the wait time is
     * appropriately decreased on each progressive join() call.
     */
    TimedThread thread = TimedThread.createWithDelay(LONG_DELAY_MS);

# Using the Request Directly

Up to now, you have been declaring the parts of the request that you need with their types.

Taking data from:

* The path as parameters.
* Headers.
* Cookies.
* etc.

And by doing so, **FastAPI** is validating that data, converting it and generating documentation for your API automatically.

But there are situations where you might need to access the `Request` object directly.

d'incloure entre ",lengthBadEnd:" caràcters",lengthTooLongStart:"La seva resposta ha de ser menor a ",lengthTooShortStart:"La seva resposta ha de ser major a ",notConfirmed:"Els valors proporcionats no poden ser confirmats",badDomain:"Ha introduït un domini incorrecte",badUrl:"La URL proporcionada no és vàlida",badCustomVal:"Els valors proporcionats no són vàlids",andSpaces:" i espais ",badInt:"El valor proporcionat no és un número vàlid",badSecurityNumber:"El número de seguretat social proporcionat...

This has been mostly done, but there remain a few holdouts (fixing these is out of scope).

To keep the Groovy DSL ergonomic, we generate methods as necessary from the non-Groovy equivalents.

Doing this provides the following specific benefits:
- **Reduce the API surface** - We no longer need to maintain two methods.
- **Consistency** - All languages have consistent access to the same APIs and ergonomics in the DSL.

      <version>4.13.2</version>
    </dependency>
    <dependency>
      <!--
      Do not include Truth in non-test scope! Doing so creates a problematic dependency cycle.
      -->
      <groupId>com.google.truth</groupId>
      <artifactId>truth</artifactId>
      <version>${truth.version}</version>
      <scope>test</scope>
      <exclusions>