import java.lang.annotation.RetentionPolicy;
import java.lang.annotation.Target;

/**
 * Java 5 annotation for describing service layer security attributes.
 *
 * <p>
 * The <code>Secured</code> annotation is used to define a list of security configuration
 * attributes for business methods.
 * <p>
 * For example:
 *
 * <pre>
 * &#064;Secured({ &quot;ROLE_USER&quot; })
 * public void create(Contact contact);
 *

     * a given entry might not include null. The right fix for the header problems is probably to
     * define a separate MultimapLink interface with a separate "header" implementation, which
     * hopefully could avoid implementing Entry or ValueSetLink at all. (But note that that approach
     * requires us to define extra classes -- unfortunate under Android.) *Then* we could consider

    return requireLinks()[i];
  }

  private void setLink(int i, long value) {
    requireLinks()[i] = value;
  }

  /*
   * We don't define getPredecessor+getSuccessor and setPredecessor+setSuccessor here because
   * they're defined above -- including logic to add and subtract 1 to map between the values stored
   * in the predecessor/successor arrays and the indexes in the elements array that they identify.
   */

import org.apache.maven.api.annotations.Nonnull;
import org.apache.maven.api.model.PluginContainer;

/**
 * Interface representing a Maven project packaging.
 * <p>
 * TODO: define how to plug in new packaging definitions using the SPI.
 *   the packaging are currently defined by Maven 3 {@code Provider<LifecycleMapping>}
 *
 * @since 4.0.0
 */
@Experimental
@Immutable
public interface Packaging extends ExtensibleEnum {
    /**

      return delegate.create(elements);
    }

    @Override
    public Entry<K, V>[] createArray(int length) {
      return delegate.createArray(length);
    }
  }

  /** Two bounds (from and to) define how to build a subMap. */
  public enum Bound {
    INCLUSIVE,
    EXCLUSIVE,
    NO_BOUND;
  }

  public static class SortedSetSubsetTestSetGenerator<E extends @Nullable Object>

   * first decrementing to zero, and then removing. putIfAbsent or replace could observe the
   * intermediate zero-state. Ways we could deal with this are:
   *
   * - Don't define any of the ConcurrentMap operations. This is the current state of affairs.
   *
   * - Define putIfAbsent and replace as treating zero and absent identically (as currently
   *   implemented below). This is a bit surprising with putIfAbsent, which really becomes

    return requireLinks()[i];
  }

  private void setLink(int i, long value) {
    requireLinks()[i] = value;
  }

  /*
   * We don't define getPredecessor+getSuccessor and setPredecessor+setSuccessor here because
   * they're defined above -- including logic to add and subtract 1 to map between the values stored
   * in the predecessor/successor arrays and the indexes in the elements array that they identify.
   */

    SUBMULTISET,
    DESCENDING;

    @Override
    public Set<Feature<? super Void>> getImpliedFeatures() {
      return Collections.emptySet();
    }
  }

  /** Two bounds (from and to) define how to build a subMultiset. */
  enum Bound {
    INCLUSIVE,
    EXCLUSIVE,
    NO_BOUND;
  }

  List<TestSuite> createDerivedSuites(SortedMultisetTestSuiteBuilder<E> parentBuilder) {

    SUBMULTISET,
    DESCENDING;

    @Override
    public Set<Feature<? super Void>> getImpliedFeatures() {
      return Collections.emptySet();
    }
  }

  /** Two bounds (from and to) define how to build a subMultiset. */
  enum Bound {
    INCLUSIVE,
    EXCLUSIVE,
    NO_BOUND;
  }

  List<TestSuite> createDerivedSuites(SortedMultisetTestSuiteBuilder<E> parentBuilder) {

      // catch absolutely everything and fall through to our 'SafeAtomicHelper'
      // The access control checks that ARFU does means the caller class has to be AbstractFuture
      // instead of SafeAtomicHelper, so we annoyingly define these here
      try {
        helper =
            new SafeAtomicHelper(
                newUpdater(Waiter.class, Thread.class, "thread"),
                newUpdater(Waiter.class, Waiter.class, "next"),