* for the field accesses in MapIteratorCache. This test *has* found other TSAN errors,
     * including in MapRetrievalCache, so I'm not sure why this one is different. I did at least
     * confirm that my change to MapIteratorCache fixes the TSAN error in the (larger) test it was
     * originally reported in.
     */
    for (Future<?> future : futures.build()) {
      future.get();
    }

     * for the field accesses in MapIteratorCache. This test *has* found other TSAN errors,
     * including in MapRetrievalCache, so I'm not sure why this one is different. I did at least
     * confirm that my change to MapIteratorCache fixes the TSAN error in the (larger) test it was
     * originally reported in.
     */
    for (Future<?> future : futures.build()) {
      future.get();
    }

    ```java
    client.setConnectionSpecs(Arrays.asList(
        ConnectionSpec.MODERN_TLS, ConnectionSpec.COMPATIBLE_TLS));
    ```

 *  **New cipher suites.** Please confirm that your webservers are reachable
    with this limited set of cipher suites.

    ```
                                             Android
    Name                                     Version

                                    <label for="confirmPassword" class="col-sm-3 text-sm-right col-form-label"><la:message
                                            key="labels.user_confirm_password"/></label>
                                    <div class="col-sm-9">
                                        <la:errors property="confirmPassword"/>

   */
  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // concurrency
  static Thread newThread(String name, Runnable runnable) {
    checkNotNull(name);
    checkNotNull(runnable);
    // TODO(b/139726489): Confirm that null is impossible here.
    Thread result = requireNonNull(platformThreadFactory().newThread(runnable));
    try {
      result.setName(name);
    } catch (SecurityException e) {

        .build()
    ```

 *  New: Add `cacheHit`, `cacheMiss`, and `cacheConditionalHit()` events to `EventListener`. Use
    these in logs, metrics, and even test cases to confirm your cache headers are configured as
    expected.

 *  New: Constant string `okhttp3.VERSION`. This is a string like "4.5.0-RC1", "4.5.0", or

peof b.errorMessageCustom&&(a.formUtils.warn("Use of deprecated function errorMessageCustom, use config.submitErrorMessageCallback instead"),b.submitErrorMessageCallback=function(a,c){b.errorMessageCustom(a,b.language.errorTitle,c,b)})}function d(b){if(b.errorMessagePosition&&"object"==typeof b.errorMessagePosition){a.formUtils.warn("Deprecated use of config parameter errorMessagePosition, use config.submitErrorMessageCallback instead");var c=b.errorMessagePosition;b.errorMessagePosition="top",b...

on the <code>TEXT</code> instruction.
The pointer information can also be omitted if the
function contains no call instructions.
Otherwise, the local stack frame must not contain pointers,
and the assembly must confirm this fact by executing the
pseudo-instruction <code>NO_LOCAL_POINTERS</code>.
Because stack resizing is implemented by moving the stack,
the stack pointer may change during any function call:

</NotificationConfiguration>
`)
	config3 := &Config{}
	if err := xml.Unmarshal(data, config3); err != nil {
		panic(err)
	}

	testCases := []struct {
		config         *Config
		region         string
		expectedResult []ARN
	}{
		{config1, "eu-west-1", []ARN{{TargetID{"1", "webhook"}, "eu-west-1"}}},
		{config1, "", []ARN{{TargetID{"1", "webhook"}, ""}}},

        Config.prp = new Properties( prp );
        try {
            Config.prp.putAll( System.getProperties() );
        } catch( SecurityException se ) {
            if( log.level > 1 )
                log.println( "SecurityException: jcifs.smb1 will ignore System properties" );
        }
    }

    /**
     * Load the <code>Config</code> with properties from the stream