if (!parentBuilder.getFeatures().contains(CollectionFeature.SUBSET_VIEW)) {
      derivedSuites.add(createSubsetSuite(parentBuilder, Bound.NO_BOUND, Bound.EXCLUSIVE));
      derivedSuites.add(createSubsetSuite(parentBuilder, Bound.INCLUSIVE, Bound.NO_BOUND));
      derivedSuites.add(createSubsetSuite(parentBuilder, Bound.INCLUSIVE, Bound.EXCLUSIVE));
    }

    return derivedSuites;
  }

  /**

    if (!parentBuilder.getFeatures().contains(NoRecurse.SUBMAP)) {
      derivedSuites.add(createSubmapSuite(parentBuilder, Bound.NO_BOUND, Bound.EXCLUSIVE));
      derivedSuites.add(createSubmapSuite(parentBuilder, Bound.INCLUSIVE, Bound.NO_BOUND));
      derivedSuites.add(createSubmapSuite(parentBuilder, Bound.INCLUSIVE, Bound.EXCLUSIVE));
    }

    return derivedSuites;
  }

  @Override

   * that entries are indexable using ints.
   */
  static final int MAXIMUM_CAPACITY = Ints.MAX_POWER_OF_TWO;

  /** The maximum number of segments to allow; used to bound constructor arguments. */
  static final int MAX_SEGMENTS = 1 << 16; // slightly conservative

  /** Number of (unsynchronized) retries in the containsValue method. */
  static final int CONTAINS_VALUE_RETRIES = 3;

  // PriorityBlockingQueue

  /**
   * Creates an empty {@code PriorityBlockingQueue} with the ordering given by its elements' natural
   * ordering.
   *
   * @since 11.0 (but the bound of {@code E} was changed from {@code Object} to {@code Comparable}
   *     in 15.0)
   */
  @SuppressWarnings("rawtypes") // https://github.com/google/guava/issues/989
  @J2ktIncompatible

    /*
     * uncheckedCastNullableTToT is safe as long as the callers are careful to pass a "real" T
     * whenever they pass `true` for the matching `has*Bound` parameter.
     */
    if (hasLowerBound) {
      int unused =
          comparator.compare(
              uncheckedCastNullableTToT(lowerEndpoint), uncheckedCastNullableTToT(lowerEndpoint));
    }

    // we try hard to make them robust in practice.  We could additionally try to add in a system
    // load timeout multiplier.  Or we could try to use a CPU time bound instead of wall clock time
    // bound.  But these ideas are harder to implement.  We do not try to detect or handle a
    // user-specified -XX:+DisableExplicitGC.
    //
    // TODO(user): Consider using

   * value} is greater than {@code max}, {@code max} is returned.
   *
   * @param value the {@code char} value to constrain
   * @param min the lower bound (inclusive) of the range to constrain {@code value} to
   * @param max the upper bound (inclusive) of the range to constrain {@code value} to
   * @throws IllegalArgumentException if {@code min > max}
   * @since 21.0
   */

   * value} is greater than {@code max}, {@code max} is returned.
   *
   * @param value the {@code double} value to constrain
   * @param min the lower bound (inclusive) of the range to constrain {@code value} to
   * @param max the upper bound (inclusive) of the range to constrain {@code value} to
   * @throws IllegalArgumentException if {@code min > max}
   * @since 21.0
   */

   * value} is greater than {@code max}, {@code max} is returned.
   *
   * @param value the {@code int} value to constrain
   * @param min the lower bound (inclusive) of the range to constrain {@code value} to
   * @param max the upper bound (inclusive) of the range to constrain {@code value} to
   * @throws IllegalArgumentException if {@code min > max}
   * @since 21.0
   */

  public static <V extends @Nullable Object> ListenableFuture<List<@Nullable V>> successfulAsList(
      ListenableFuture<? extends V>... futures) {
    /*
     * Another way to express this signature would be to bound <V> by @NonNull and accept
     * LF<? extends @Nullable V>. That might be better: There's currently no difference between the
     * outputs users get when calling this with <Foo> and calling it with <@Nullable Foo>. The only