private static final ImmutableList<Range<Integer>> RANGES;
  private static final int MIN_BOUND = 0;
  private static final int MAX_BOUND = 10;

  static {
    ImmutableList.Builder<Range<Integer>> builder = ImmutableList.builder();

    builder.add(Range.<Integer>all());

    // Add one-ended ranges
    for (int i = MIN_BOUND; i <= MAX_BOUND; i++) {
      for (BoundType type : BoundType.values()) {

        bind(MojoExecutionScope.class).toInstance(scope);
        bind(MavenProject.class)
                .toProvider(MojoExecutionScope.seededKeyProvider())
                .in(scope);
        bind(MojoExecution.class)
                .toProvider(MojoExecutionScope.seededKeyProvider())
                .in(scope);
        bind(Log.class).toProvider(MojoExecutionScope.seededKeyProvider()).in(scope);

    private static final String CHECK_UPPER_BOUND = "check upper bound";

    private static final String CHECK_UPPER_BOUND_INCLUSIVE = "check upper bound is inclusive";

    private static final String CHECK_LOWER_BOUND = "check lower bound";

    private static final String CHECK_LOWER_BOUND_INCLUSIVE = "check lower bound is inclusive";

    SortedSet<E> createSubSet(SortedSet<E> set, E firstExclusive, E lastExclusive) {
      if (from == Bound.NO_BOUND && to == Bound.EXCLUSIVE) {
        return set.headSet(lastExclusive);
      } else if (from == Bound.INCLUSIVE && to == Bound.NO_BOUND) {
        return set.tailSet(firstInclusive);
      } else if (from == Bound.INCLUSIVE && to == Bound.EXCLUSIVE) {
        return set.subSet(firstInclusive, lastExclusive);
      } else {

      derivedSuites.add(createSubsetSuite(parentBuilder, Bound.EXCLUSIVE, Bound.NO_BOUND));
      derivedSuites.add(createSubsetSuite(parentBuilder, Bound.EXCLUSIVE, Bound.EXCLUSIVE));
      derivedSuites.add(createSubsetSuite(parentBuilder, Bound.EXCLUSIVE, Bound.INCLUSIVE));
      derivedSuites.add(createSubsetSuite(parentBuilder, Bound.INCLUSIVE, Bound.INCLUSIVE));
    }

      derivedSuites.add(createSubsetSuite(parentBuilder, Bound.EXCLUSIVE, Bound.NO_BOUND));
      derivedSuites.add(createSubsetSuite(parentBuilder, Bound.EXCLUSIVE, Bound.EXCLUSIVE));
      derivedSuites.add(createSubsetSuite(parentBuilder, Bound.EXCLUSIVE, Bound.INCLUSIVE));
      derivedSuites.add(createSubsetSuite(parentBuilder, Bound.INCLUSIVE, Bound.INCLUSIVE));
    }

 */
@ElementTypesAreNonnullByDefault
/*
 * A nullable bound would let users create a TypeParameter instance for a parameter with a nullable
 * bound. However, it would also let them create `new TypeParameter<@Nullable T>() {}`, which
 * wouldn't behave as users might expect. Additionally, it's not clear how the TypeToken API could
 * support even a "normal" `TypeParameter<T>` when `<T>` has a nullable bound. (See the discussion

      derivedSuites.add(createSubMultisetSuite(parentBuilder, Bound.NO_BOUND, Bound.EXCLUSIVE));
      derivedSuites.add(createSubMultisetSuite(parentBuilder, Bound.NO_BOUND, Bound.INCLUSIVE));
      derivedSuites.add(createSubMultisetSuite(parentBuilder, Bound.EXCLUSIVE, Bound.NO_BOUND));
      derivedSuites.add(createSubMultisetSuite(parentBuilder, Bound.EXCLUSIVE, Bound.EXCLUSIVE));

      derivedSuites.add(createSubMultisetSuite(parentBuilder, Bound.NO_BOUND, Bound.EXCLUSIVE));
      derivedSuites.add(createSubMultisetSuite(parentBuilder, Bound.NO_BOUND, Bound.INCLUSIVE));
      derivedSuites.add(createSubMultisetSuite(parentBuilder, Bound.EXCLUSIVE, Bound.NO_BOUND));
      derivedSuites.add(createSubMultisetSuite(parentBuilder, Bound.EXCLUSIVE, Bound.EXCLUSIVE));

1D40B         ; mapped                 ; 006C          # 3.1  MATHEMATICAL BOLD CAPITAL L
1D40C         ; mapped                 ; 006D          # 3.1  MATHEMATICAL BOLD CAPITAL M
1D40D         ; mapped                 ; 006E          # 3.1  MATHEMATICAL BOLD CAPITAL N
1D40E         ; mapped                 ; 006F          # 3.1  MATHEMATICAL BOLD CAPITAL O