case -2:
          // requireNonNull is safe because right must exist in order to get a negative factor.
          requireNonNull(right);
          if (right.balanceFactor() > 0) {
            right = right.rotateRight();
          }
          return rotateLeft();
        case 2:
          // requireNonNull is safe because left must exist in order to get a positive factor.
          requireNonNull(left);

   * `new Integer` (as we do) instead of `Integer.valueOf`. However, under J2KT, `new Integer`
   * gets translated back to `Integer.valueOf` because that is the only thing J2KT can support. And
   * anyway, it's nice to avoid `Integer.valueOf` because the Android toolchain optimizes multiple
   * `Integer.valueOf` calls into one! So we stick with the deprecated `Integer` constructor.
   */

        connections.removePredecessor(node);
        --edgeCount;
      }
    }

    for (N successor : ImmutableList.copyOf(connections.successors())) {
      // requireNonNull is safe because the node is a successor.
      requireNonNull(nodeConnections.getWithoutCaching(successor)).removePredecessor(node);
      requireNonNull(connections.removeSuccessor(successor));
      --edgeCount;
    }

   *   even back to `this.seq`. However, that may suggest that we're defending against concurrent
   *   mutation, which is not an actual risk because we use `synchronized`.
   * - Make `remaining` require a non-null `seq` argument. But this is a bit weird because the
   *   method, while it would avoid the instance field `seq` would still access the instance field
   *   `pos`.
   */

  @Override

          if (!initialized) {
            T t = delegate.get();
            value = t;
            initialized = true;
            return t;
          }
        }
      }
      // This is safe because we checked `initialized`.
      return uncheckedCastNullableTToT(value);
    }

    @Override
    public String toString() {
      return "Suppliers.memoize("

      if (node.previousSibling == null) {
        // requireNonNull is safe because we checked that not *both* siblings were null.
        keyList.head = requireNonNull(node.nextSibling);
      } else {
        node.previousSibling.nextSibling = node.nextSibling;
      }

      if (node.nextSibling == null) {
        // requireNonNull is safe because we checked that not *both* siblings were null.

     * message}.
     */
    @Override
    public String getMessage() {
      // requireNonNull is safe because ExampleStackTrace sets a non-null message.
      StringBuilder message = new StringBuilder(requireNonNull(super.getMessage()));
      for (Throwable t = conflictingStackTrace; t != null; t = t.getCause()) {
        message.append(", ").append(t.getMessage());
      }
      return message.toString();
    }
  }

         * don't _want_ our new TypeVariable to be equal to the JDK TypeVariable because it has
         * _different bounds_ than the JDK TypeVariable. And it wouldn't make sense for our new
         * TypeVariable to be equal to any _other_ JDK TypeVariable, either, because any other JDK
         * TypeVariable must have a different declaration or name. The only TypeVariable that our

  }

  ExplicitOrdering(ImmutableMap<T, Integer> rankMap) {
    this.rankMap = rankMap;
  }

  @Override
  public int compare(T left, T right) {
    return rank(left) - rank(right); // safe because both are nonnegative
  }

  private int rank(T value) {
    Integer rank = rankMap.get(value);
    if (rank == null) {
      throw new IncomparableValueException(value);
    }
    return rank;
  }

   * ConcurrentMap#replace(Object, Object, Object)}.
   */
  REPLACED {
    @Override
    boolean wasEvicted() {
      return false;
    }
  },

  /**
   * The entry was removed automatically because its key or value was garbage-collected. This can
   * occur when using {@link CacheBuilder#weakKeys}, {@link CacheBuilder#weakValues}, or {@link
   * CacheBuilder#softValues}.
   */
  COLLECTED {
    @Override