kmsRouter.Methods(http.MethodGet).Path(version + "/key/status").HandlerFunc(gz(httpTraceAll(kmsAPI.KMSKeyStatusHandler)))

		// KMS Policy APIs
		kmsRouter.Methods(http.MethodPost).Path(version+"/policy/assign").HandlerFunc(gz(httpTraceAll(kmsAPI.KMSAssignPolicyHandler))).Queries("policy", "{policy:.*}")

# ==============================================================================

name: Trusted Partner PR
on:
  pull_request_target:

permissions:
  contents: read

jobs:
  assign-partner-tags:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    permissions:
      # Needed to attach tags into the PR
      issues: write
      contents: write
      pull-requests: write
    if: |

{{/* affinity - https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/configuration/assign-pod-node/ */}} {{ define "nodeaffinity" }} nodeAffinity: requiredDuringSchedu: {{- include "nodeAffinityRequired" . }} preferredDuringSched: {{- include "nodeAffinityPreferre" . }} {{- end }} {{- define "nodeAffinityRequired" }} {{- $nodeSelector := default .global.defaultNodeSelector .nodeSelector -}} {{- if or .global.arch $nodeSelector }} nodeSelectorTerms: - matchExpressions: {{- if .global.arch }} - key: kubernetes.io/arch...

     *
     * @param id            the unique identifier of the repository
     * @param url           the URL of the repository
     * @param layout        the layout of the repository
     * @param uniqueVersion whether to assign each snapshot a unique version
     */
    public DefaultArtifactRepository(String id, String url, ArtifactRepositoryLayout layout, boolean uniqueVersion) {
        super(id, url);
        this.layout = layout;
    }

If the change truly is generally purpose, it is generally preferred to have broader APIs. For example, instead of providing
direct access to each of the complex fields in [affinity](https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/scheduling-eviction/assign-pod-node/), just providing
a single `affinity` field that is passed through as-is to the Kubernetes resource.
This provides maximum flexibility with minimal API surface overhead.

## Making changes

  "caBundle" .Values.istiodRemote.injectionCABundle
  "namespace" .Release.Namespace }}
{{- define "core" }}
{{- /* Kubernetes unfortunately requires a unique name for the webhook in some newer versions, so we assign
a unique prefix to each. */}}
- name: {{.Prefix}}sidecar-injector.istio.io
  clientConfig:
    {{- if .injectionURL }}
    url: "{{ .injectionURL }}"
    {{- else }}
    service:

   * or extract a variable, and put the suppression on that. However, a local variable typically
   * doesn't work: Because nullness analyses typically infer the nullness of local variables,
   * there's no way to assign a {@code @Nullable T} to a field {@code T foo;} and instruct the
   * analysis that that means "plain {@code T}" rather than the inferred type {@code @Nullable T}.

- [node selector](https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/configuration/assign-pod-node/#nodeselector)
- [toleration](https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/configuration/taint-and-toleration/)
- [affinity and anti-affinity](https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/configuration/assign-pod-node/#affinity-and-anti-affinity)
- [deployment strategy](https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/workloads/controllers/deployment/)

  }

  /*
   * To avoid the need to call requireNonNull so much, we could consider more clever approaches,
   * such as:
   *
   * - Make checkOpen return the non-null `seq`. Then callers can assign that to a local variable or
   *   even back to `this.seq`. However, that may suggest that we're defending against concurrent
   *   mutation, which is not an actual risk because we use `synchronized`.

  "reinvocationPolicy" .Values.sidecarInjectorWebhook.reinvocationPolicy
  "namespace" .Release.Namespace }}
{{- define "core" }}
{{- /* Kubernetes unfortunately requires a unique name for the webhook in some newer versions, so we assign
a unique prefix to each. */}}
- name: {{.Prefix}}sidecar-injector.istio.io
  clientConfig:
    {{- if .injectionURL }}
    url: "{{ .injectionURL }}"
    {{- else }}
    service: