* ordering of all views in the returned table. Note that some views of the original table and the
   * copied table may have different iteration orders. For more control over the ordering, create a
   * {@link Builder} and call {@link Builder#orderRowsBy}, {@link Builder#orderColumnsBy}, and
   * {@link Builder#putAll}
   *

import java.util.logging.Level;

/**
 * A list of listeners for implementing a concurrency friendly observable object.
 *
 * <p>Listeners are registered once via {@link #addListener} and then may be invoked by {@linkplain
 * #enqueue enqueueing} and then {@linkplain #dispatch dispatching} events.
 *
 * <p>The API of this class is designed to make it easy to achieve the following properties
 *
 * <ul>

    public UUID(rpc.uuid_t uuid) {
        time_low = uuid.time_low;
        time_mid = uuid.time_mid;
        time_hi_and_version = uuid.time_hi_and_version;
        clock_seq_hi_and_reserved = uuid.clock_seq_hi_and_reserved;
        clock_seq_low = uuid.clock_seq_low;
        node = new byte[6];
        node[0] = uuid.node[0];
        node[1] = uuid.node[1];
        node[2] = uuid.node[2];

   * internal, unbounded pool at the first call to {@code addListener} and holding it until the
   * future is {@linkplain Future#isDone() done}.
   *
   * <p>Prefer to create {@code ListenableFuture} instances with {@link SettableFuture}, {@link
   * MoreExecutors#listeningDecorator( java.util.concurrent.ExecutorService)}, {@link
   * ListenableFutureTask}, {@link AbstractFuture}, and other utilities over creating plain {@code

 *
 * <p><b>Warning: joiner instances are always immutable</b>; a configuration method such as {@code
 * useForNull} has no effect on the instance it is invoked on! You must store and use the new joiner
 * instance returned by the method. This makes joiners thread-safe, and safe to store as {@code
 * static final} constants.
 *
 * <pre>{@code
 * // Bad! Do not do this!
 * Joiner joiner = Joiner.on(',');
 * joiner.skipNulls(); // does nothing!

         * the andx command will not be written and therefore the
         * response will not read a batched command and therefore
         * the 'received' member of the response object will not
         * be set to true indicating the send and sendTransaction
         * methods that the next part should be sent. This is a
         * very indirect and simple batching control mechanism.
         */

   *   <li>{@code proxy.toString()} delegates to {@link AbstractInvocationHandler#toString}
   *   <li>{@code proxy.equals(argument)} returns true if:
   *       <ul>
   *         <li>{@code proxy} and {@code argument} are of the same type
   *         <li>and {@link AbstractInvocationHandler#equals} returns true for the {@link
   *             InvocationHandler} of {@code argument}
   *       </ul>

 *
 * <p>On different platforms AbstractFuture uses different strategies for its core synchronization
 * primitives. The strategies are all implemented as subtypes of AtomicHelper and the strategy is
 * selected in the static initializer of AbstractFuture. This is convenient and performant but
 * introduces some testing difficulties. This test exercises the two fallback strategies in abstract
 * future.
 *
 * <ul>

    // Every node is, at a minimum, reachable from itself. Since the resulting transitive closure
    // will have no isolated nodes, we can skip adding nodes explicitly and let putEdge() do it.

    if (graph.isDirected()) {
      // Note: works for both directed and undirected graphs, but we only use in the directed case.
      for (N node : graph.nodes()) {
        for (N reachableNode : reachableNodes(graph, node)) {

   *   <li>If {@code tolerance} is zero, and neither {@code a} nor {@code b} is NaN, then {@code a}
   *       and {@code b} are fuzzily equal if and only if {@code a == b}.
   *   <li>With {@link Double#POSITIVE_INFINITY} tolerance, all non-NaN values are fuzzily equal.
   *   <li>With finite tolerance, {@code Double.POSITIVE_INFINITY} and {@code