EXPECT_TF_META("v", list_size, TF_ATTR_INT, -1);
  TF_OperationGetAttrIntList(oper, "v", values, list_size, s_);
  EXPECT_EQ(TF_OK, TF_GetCode(s_)) << TF_Message(s_);
  EXPECT_TRUE(std::equal(std::begin(list), std::end(list), std::begin(values)));
}

TEST_F(CApiAttributesTest, Float) {
  auto desc = init("float");
  TF_SetAttrFloat(desc, "v", 2.718);

  auto oper = TF_FinishOperation(desc, s_);

								<la:message key="labels.upgrade_title_configuration" />
							</h1>
						</div>
					</div>
				</div>
			</div>
			<section class="content">
				<la:form action="/admin/upgrade/">
					<%-- Message: BEGIN --%>
					<div class="col-md-12">
						<la:info id="msg" message="true">
							<div class="alert alert-info">${msg}</div>
						</la:info>
						<la:errors />
					</div>
					<%-- Message: END --%>

---

O ponto principal é que **nenhum** desses são **regras escritas em pedra** que você deve seguir cegamente. Você pode usar essas idéias para **avaliar seu próprio caso de uso** e decidir qual é a melhor abordagem para seu sistema, verificando como gerenciar os conceitos de:

* Segurança - HTTPS
* Executando na inicialização

type ListMultipartsInfo struct {
	// Together with upload-id-marker, this parameter specifies the multipart upload
	// after which listing should begin.
	KeyMarker string

	// Together with key-marker, specifies the multipart upload after which listing
	// should begin. If key-marker is not specified, the upload-id-marker parameter
	// is ignored.
	UploadIDMarker string

	db.Mux.Unlock()

	// prepare completed
	defer close(cacheStmt.prepared)

	// Reason why cannot lock conn.PrepareContext
	// suppose the maxopen is 1, g1 is creating record and g2 is querying record.
	// 1. g1 begin tx, g1 is requeue because of waiting for the system call, now `db.ConnPool` db.numOpen == 1.
	// 2. g2 select lock `conn.PrepareContext(ctx, query)`, now db.numOpen == db.maxOpen , wait for release.

    if (!user_schemes->empty()) {
      auto is_requested_scheme = [user_schemes](const auto& scheme) {
        return std::find(user_schemes->begin(), user_schemes->end(), scheme) ==
               user_schemes->end();
      };
      auto end = std::remove_if(all_schemes->begin(), all_schemes->end(),
                                is_requested_scheme);
      all_schemes->erase(end, all_schemes->end());
    }
  }

  /** Creates a new, empty {@link ExecutionList}. */
  public ExecutionList() {}

  /**
   * Adds the {@code Runnable} and accompanying {@code Executor} to the list of listeners to
   * execute. If execution has already begun, the listener is executed immediately.
   *
   * <p>When selecting an executor, note that {@code directExecutor} is dangerous in some cases. See

   *
   * This method returns false unless it is overridden by a subclass.
   *
   * ### Duplex Transmission
   *
   * With regular HTTP calls the request always completes sending before the response may begin
   * receiving. With duplex the request and response may be interleaved! That is, request body bytes
   * may be sent after response headers or body bytes have been received.
   *

## Vida útil (_Lifespan_)

Você pode definir essa lógica de *inicialização* e *encerramento* usando os parâmetros de `lifespan` da aplicação `FastAPI`, e um "gerenciador de contexto" (te mostrarei o que é isso a seguir).

Vamos iniciar com um exemplo e ver isso detalhadamente.

Nós criamos uma função assíncrona chamada `lifespan()` com `yield` como este:

```Python hl_lines="16  19"
{!../../../docs_src/events/tutorial003.py!}

# _USE_MATH_DEFINES is defined.
build:windows --copt=/D_USE_MATH_DEFINES
build:windows --host_copt=/D_USE_MATH_DEFINES

# Windows has a relatively short command line limit, which TF has begun to hit.
# See https://docs.bazel.build/versions/main/windows.html
build:windows --features=compiler_param_file
build:windows --features=archive_param_file