return true;
  }

  /**
   * Checks all the properties that should always hold of a map. Also calls {@link
   * #assertMoreInvariants} to check invariants that are peculiar to specific implementations.
   *
   * @see #assertMoreInvariants
   * @param map the map to check.
   */
  protected final void assertInvariants(Map<K, V> map) {
    Set<K> keySet = map.keySet();
    Collection<V> valueCollection = map.values();

   * need to be signalled because it is not known which if any of them have waiters (and hasWaiters
   * can't be used reliably because of a check-then-act race). With our Monitor guards, we only
   * signal the first active guard that is satisfied. But the corresponding thread may have already

                .readAttributes();
        assertThat(attributes.permissions()).containsExactly(OWNER_READ, OWNER_WRITE);
      }
    }
    out.close();

    // Check that source returns the right data
    assertTrue(Arrays.equals(data, source.read()));

    // Make sure that reset deleted the file
    out.reset();
    if (file != null) {
      assertFalse(file.exists());
    }

    AvlNode<E> root = rootReference.get();
    if (root == null) {
      return null;
    }
    AvlNode<E> node;
    if (range.hasLowerBound()) {
      // The cast is safe because of the hasLowerBound check.
      E endpoint = uncheckedCastNullableTToT(range.getLowerEndpoint());
      node = root.ceiling(comparator(), endpoint);
      if (node == null) {
        return null;
      }

    }
  }

  /*
   * Whenever an implementation uses `instanceof` on a parameter instance, the test has to know that
   * (so much for "black box") and try instances that both do and don't pass the check. The "don't"
   * half of that is more awkward to arrange...
   */
  private static <T> Iterable<T> iterable(final Collection<T> collection) {
    // return collection::iterator;
    return new Iterable<T>() {

 * newHasher().putByte(b1).putBytes(new byte[] { b2, b3 }).hash()
 * newHasher().putBytes(new byte[] { b1, b2, b3 }).hash()
 * }</pre>
 *
 * <p>If you wish to avoid this, you should either prepend or append the size of each chunk. Keep in
 * mind that when dealing with char sequences, the encoded form of two concatenated char sequences
 * is not equivalent to the concatenation of their encoded form. Therefore, {@link

        .putShort((short) 0x0000)
        .putShort((short) 0x0000);
    assertEquals(hashCode, hasher.hash().asLong());
  }

  public void testHashFloatIsStable() {
    // Just a spot check.  Better than nothing.
    Hasher hasher = HASH_FN.newHasher();
    hasher.putFloat(0x01000101f).putFloat(0f);
    assertEquals(0x49f9d18ee8ae1b28L, hasher.hash().asLong());

    hasher = HASH_FN.newHasher();

    }
  }

  /*
   * Whenever an implementation uses `instanceof` on a parameter instance, the test has to know that
   * (so much for "black box") and try instances that both do and don't pass the check. The "don't"
   * half of that is more awkward to arrange...
   */
  private static <T> Iterable<T> iterable(final Collection<T> collection) {
    // return collection::iterator;
    return new Iterable<T>() {

 *       scalability or other performance factors (see the separate "jtreg" tests for a set intended
 *       to check these for the most central aspects of functionality.) So, most tests use the
 *       smallest sensible numbers of threads, collection sizes, etc needed to check basic
 *       conformance.
 *   <li>The test classes currently do not declare inclusion in any particular package to simplify

  @Override
  public void clear() {
    if (needsAllocArrays()) {
      return;
    }
    this.firstEntry = ENDPOINT;
    this.lastEntry = ENDPOINT;
    // Either both arrays are null or neither is, but we check both to satisfy the nullness checker.
    if (predecessor != null && successor != null) {
      Arrays.fill(predecessor, 0, size(), 0);
      Arrays.fill(successor, 0, size(), 0);
    }
    super.clear();
  }