# Development - Contributing

First, you might want to see the basic ways to [help FastAPI and get help](help-fastapi.md){.internal-link target=_blank}.

## Developing

If you already cloned the <a href="https://github.com/tiangolo/fastapi" class="external-link" target="_blank">fastapi repository</a> and you want to deep dive in the code, here are some guidelines to set up your environment.

### Virtual environment with `venv`

  /**
   * No-op null-pointer test for {@link LongAdder} to override the {@link PackageSanityTests}
   * version, which checks package-private methods that we don't want to have to annotate as {@code
   * Nullable} because we don't want diffs from jsr166e.
   */
  public void testNulls() {}

  public void testOverflows() {
    LongAdder longAdder = new LongAdder();
    longAdder.add(Long.MAX_VALUE);

	tests := []struct {
		sc   string
		want bool
	}{
		{"STANDARD", true},
		{"REDUCED_REDUNDANCY", true},
		{"", false},
		{"INVALID", false},
		{"123", false},
		{"MINIO_STORAGE_CLASS_RRS", false},
		{"MINIO_STORAGE_CLASS_STANDARD", false},
	}
	for i, tt := range tests {
		if got := IsValid(tt.sc); got != tt.want {

    "version" that omits the class to avoid conflicts with the copy in Guava
    itself. The idea is:

    - If users want only ListenableFuture, they depend on listenablefuture-1.0.

    - If users want all of Guava, they depend on guava, which, as of Guava
    27.0, depends on
    listenablefuture-9999.0-empty-to-avoid-conflict-with-guava. The 9999.0-...

// It would be cool if there was a hook that I could use to set up a test environment.
// I want to set up a local/remote repositories for testing but I don't want to have
// to change them when I change the layout of the repositories. So I want to generate
// the structure I want to test by using the artifact handler manager which dictates
// the layout used for a particular artifact type.

/**
 */

	if domain := S3.String(); domain != Domain {
		t.Errorf("S3's string method returns wrong domain: got '%s' - want '%s'", domain, Domain)
	}
}

func TestSSECString(t *testing.T) {
	const Domain = "SSE-C"
	if domain := SSEC.String(); domain != Domain {
		t.Errorf("SSEC's string method returns wrong domain: got '%s' - want '%s'", domain, Domain)
	}
}

var ssecUnsealObjectKeyTests = []struct {
	Headers        http.Header

    * This is particularly important for **security**, we'll see more of that below.

## `response_model` Parameter

There are some cases where you need or want to return some data that is not exactly what the type declares.

```

Dans cet exemple, nous n'avons déclaré aucun modèle Pydantic. En fait, le corps de la requête n'est même pas <abbr title="converti d'un format simple, comme des octets, en objets Python">parsé</abbr> en tant que JSON, il est lu directement en tant que `bytes`, et la fonction `magic_data_reader()` serait chargé de l'analyser d'une manière ou d'une autre.

Néanmoins, nous pouvons déclarer le schéma attendu pour le corps de la requête.

				VersionID:   "",
				IsLatest:    true,
				NumVersions: 1,
			},
			want: 0,
			lc:   lc,
		},
	}
	for i, tc := range tests {
		t.Run(fmt.Sprintf("test-%d", i+1), func(t *testing.T) {
			if got := tc.lc.FilterRules(tc.opts); len(got) != tc.want {
				t.Fatalf("Expected %d rules to match but got %d", tc.want, len(got))
			}
			w := httptest.NewRecorder()
			tc.lc.SetPredictionHeaders(w, tc.opts)

### One Process per Container

In this type of scenario, you probably would want to have **a single (Uvicorn) process per container**, as you would already be handling replication at the cluster level.

So, in this case, you **would not** want to have a process manager like Gunicorn with Uvicorn workers, or Uvicorn using its own Uvicorn workers. You would want to have just a **single Uvicorn process** per container (but probably multiple containers).