exec.execute(task);
    runLatch.await();
    assertEquals(1, listenerLatch.getCount());
    assertFalse(task.isDone());
    assertFalse(task.isCancelled());

    // Finish the task by unblocking the task latch.  Then wait for the
    // listener to be called by blocking on the listener latch.
    taskLatch.countDown();
    assertEquals(25, task.get().intValue());
    assertTrue(listenerLatch.await(5, TimeUnit.SECONDS));

                        continue;
                    }

                    curResp.wait();
                    if ( handleIntermediate(request, curResp) ) {
                        continue;
                    }
                    if ( log.isDebugEnabled() ) {
                        log.debug("Wait returned state is " + this.state);
                    }
                    if ( isDisconnected() ) {

     * If someone called cancel(true), it is possible that the interrupted bit hasn't been set yet.
     * Wait for the interrupting thread to set DONE. (See interruptTask().) We want to wait so that
     * the interrupting thread doesn't interrupt the _next_ thing to run on this thread.
     *
     * Note: We don't reset the interrupted bit, just wait for it to be set. If this is a thread

 *     while (value == null) {
 *       wait();
 *     }
 *     V result = value;
 *     value = null;
 *     notifyAll();
 *     return result;
 *   }
 *
 *   public synchronized void set(V newValue) throws InterruptedException {
 *     while (value != null) {
 *       wait();
 *     }
 *     value = newValue;
 *     notifyAll();
 *   }
 * }

    exec.execute(task);
    runLatch.await();
    assertEquals(1, listenerLatch.getCount());
    assertFalse(task.isDone());
    assertFalse(task.isCancelled());

    // Finish the task by unblocking the task latch.  Then wait for the
    // listener to be called by blocking on the listener latch.
    taskLatch.countDown();
    assertEquals(25, task.get().intValue());
    assertTrue(listenerLatch.await(5, TimeUnit.SECONDS));

                              // WAIT #1
                              barrier.await(1, TimeUnit.SECONDS);

                              // WAIT #2
                              barrier.await(1, TimeUnit.SECONDS);
                              assertTrue(executor.isShutdown());
                              assertFalse(executor.isTerminated());

                              // WAIT #3

        // this is not too great as it depends on timing/clockskew
        // first we need to obtain a ticket, therefor need valid credentials
        // then we need to wait until the ticket is expired
        int wait = 10 * 1000;
        long princExp = start + ( wait / 2 );
        Subject s = getInitiatorSubject(getTestUser(), getTestUserPassword(), getTestUserDomainRequired(), princExp);

		client := client
		g.Go(func() error {
			if client == nil {
				return errPeerOffline
			}
			_, err := client.GetBucketInfo(ctx, bucket, BucketOptions{})
			return err
		}, idx)
	}

	errs := g.Wait()

	var poolErrs []error
	for poolIdx := 0; poolIdx < sys.poolsCount; poolIdx++ {
		perPoolErrs := make([]error, 0, len(sys.peerClients))
		for i, client := range sys.peerClients {

		"Invalid value for batch key rotation workers wait",
		"Please input a non-negative duration",
		"keyrotation_workers_wait should be > 0ms",
	)
	ErrInvalidBatchReplicationWorkersWait = newErrFn(
		"Invalid value for batch replication workers wait",
		"Please input a non-negative duration",
		"replication_workers_wait should be > 0ms",
	)
	ErrInvalidBatchExpirationWorkersWait = newErrFn(

    * On n'écrit pas une application avec uniquement Uvicorn. Cela signifie que le code devrait inclure plus ou moins, au minimum, tout le code offert par Starlette (ou **FastAPI**). Et si on fait cela, l'application finale apportera les mêmes complications que si on avait utilisé un framework et que l'on avait minimisé la quantité de code et de bugs.