Iterable<T> result = (Iterable<T>) iterable;
      return result;
    }
    return new UnmodifiableIterable<>(iterable);
  }

  /**
   * Simply returns its argument.
   *
   * @deprecated no need to use this
   * @since 10.0
   */
  @Deprecated
  public static <E> Iterable<E> unmodifiableIterable(ImmutableCollection<E> iterable) {
    return checkNotNull(iterable);
  }

  @GwtIncompatible // SerializableTester
  public void testStringConverterSerialization() {
    SerializableTester.reserializeAndAssert(Shorts.stringConverter());
  }

  public void testToArray() {
    // need explicit type parameter to avoid javac warning!?
    List<Short> none = Arrays.<Short>asList();
    assertThat(Shorts.toArray(none)).isEqualTo(EMPTY);

    List<Short> one = Arrays.asList((short) 1);

  @GwtIncompatible // SerializableTester
  public void testStringConverterSerialization() {
    SerializableTester.reserializeAndAssert(Floats.stringConverter());
  }

  public void testToArray() {
    // need explicit type parameter to avoid javac warning!?
    List<Float> none = Arrays.<Float>asList();
    assertThat(Floats.toArray(none)).isEqualTo(EMPTY);

    List<Float> one = Arrays.asList((float) 1);

      long seed = insertRandomly(elements, q);
      while (!q.isEmpty()) {
        elements.add(0, q.pollLast());
      }
      assertEqualsUsingSeed(seed, expected, elements);
    }
  }

  public void testCorrectOrdering_randomAccess() {
    long seed = new Random().nextLong();
    Random random = new Random(seed);
    PriorityQueue<Integer> control = new PriorityQueue<>();

     * ImmutableSortedSet#orderedBy}.
     */
    /*
     * TODO(cpovirk): use Object[] instead of E[] in the mainline? (The backport is different and
     * doesn't need this suppression, but we keep it to minimize diffs.) Generally be more clear
     * about when we have an Object[] vs. a Comparable[] or other array type in internalArray? If we

      return result;
    }
    return new UnmodifiableMultiset<>(checkNotNull(multiset));
  }

  /**
   * Simply returns its argument.
   *
   * @deprecated no need to use this
   * @since 10.0
   */
  @Deprecated
  public static <E> Multiset<E> unmodifiableMultiset(ImmutableMultiset<E> multiset) {
    return checkNotNull(multiset);
  }

    }
  }

  private static Iterator<Integer> iterateOver(int... values) {
    // Note: Ints.asList's iterator does not support remove which we need for testing.
    return new ArrayList<>(Ints.asList(values)).iterator();
  }

  public void testElementsEqual() {
    Iterable<?> a;
    Iterable<?> b;

    // Base case.
    a = Lists.newArrayList();

       * one as it is because one of our users has defined a wrapper API around Preconditions,
       * declaring a checkState method that accepts a possibly null template. So we'd need to update
       * that user first.
       */
      @CheckForNull String errorMessageTemplate,
      @CheckForNull @Nullable Object... errorMessageArgs) {
    if (!expression) {

     * @return uses the Maven project and its child modules
     */
    boolean aggregator() default false;

    /**
     * does this Mojo need to be online to be executed?
     * @return need to be online
     */
    boolean onlineRequired() default false;

    /**
     * TODO: v4: add a SPI for the configurator
     * configurator bean name.

   * remove elements later. Otherwise, for non-null elements use {@link ImmutableList#of()} (for
   * varargs) or {@link ImmutableList#copyOf(Object[])} (for an array) instead. If any elements
   * might be null, or you need support for {@link List#set(int, Object)}, use {@link
   * Arrays#asList}.
   *
   * <p>Note that even when you do need the ability to add or remove, this method provides only a