* Plugins

      * Introduces the ability to extend kubectl by adding third-party plugins. Developer preview, please refer to the documentation for instructions about how to use it. ([#37499](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/37499), [@fabianofranz](https://github.com/fabianofranz))

          <option name="linkRegexp" value="https://upsource.jetbrains.com/kotlin/review/$0" />
        </IssueNavigationLink>
        <IssueNavigationLink>
          <option name="issueRegexp" value="(\w+)-(CR|MR)-(\d+)" />
          <option name="linkRegexp" value="https://jetbrains.team/p/$1/reviews/$3" />
        </IssueNavigationLink>
        <IssueNavigationLink>

- Added feature support to Windows for configuring session affinity of Kubernetes services.
  required: [Windows Server vNext Insider Preview Build 19551](https://blogs.windows.com/windowsexperience/2020/01/28/announcing-windows-server-vnext-insider-preview-build-19551/) (or higher) ([#91701](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/91701), [@elweb9858](https://github.com/elweb9858)) [SIG Network and Windows]

name: 'Dependency Review'
on: [pull_request]

permissions:
  contents: read

jobs:
  dependency-review:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - name: 'Checkout Repository'
        uses: actions/checkout@v4
      - name: 'Dependency Review'

- [`KT-61315`](https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/KT-61315) Publish common sources in kotlin-test-js sources jar
- [`KT-56608`](https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/KT-56608) WASI Preview1 version of Kotlin/Wasm stdlib
- [`KT-55765`](https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/KT-55765) Review and stabilize stdlib surface available in K/N

    rare occasion we may reject it.

**3. Review**

-   For a valid PR, reviewer (person familiar with the code/functionality)
    checks if the PR looks good or needs additional changes.
-   If all looks good, the reviewer will approve the PR.
-   If a change is needed, the contributor is requested to make the suggested
    change.
-   You make the change and submit it for the review again.

* They are rarely updated after creation and initial review, and then become hard to follow, especially after important decisions are made
* They are not synced with the code to reflect the eventual solution that is committed
* Google Docs is not a "code oriented" tool, like asciidoc can be
* Review in Google Doc is not as simple as a PR code review in GitHub

## Decision

* They are rarely updated after creation and initial review, and then become hard to follow, especially after important decisions are made
* They are not synced with the code to reflect the eventual solution that is committed
* Google Docs is not a "code-oriented" tool, like asciidoc can be
* Review in Google Docs is not as simple as a PR code review in GitHub

## Decision

      },
      "protocol": "HBONE",
      "uid": "Kubernetes//Pod/bookinfo/reviews-v3-5b9bd44f4-7fff4",
      "name": "reviews-v3-5b9bd44f4-7fff4",
      "namespace": "bookinfo",
      "trustDomain": "cluster.local",
      "serviceAccount": "bookinfo-reviews",
      "workloadName": "reviews-v3",
      "workloadType": "deployment",
      "canonicalName": "reviews",
      "canonicalRevision": "v3",
      "network": "network3",

* [Créent des Pull Requests](help-fastapi.md#creer-une-pull-request){.internal-link target=_blank}.
* Review les Pull Requests, [particulièrement important pour les traductions](contributing.md#traductions){.internal-link target=_blank}.

Une salve d'applaudissements pour eux. 👏 🙇

## Utilisateurs les plus actifs le mois dernier