import java.util.Map;

import org.apache.maven.api.toolchain.ToolchainModel;
import org.apache.maven.execution.MavenSession;
import org.slf4j.Logger;

/**
 * TODO: refactor this, component extending component is bad practice.
 *
 */
@Named
@Singleton
public class DefaultToolchainManagerPrivate extends DefaultToolchainManager implements ToolchainManagerPrivate {
    @Inject

    WeakReference<? extends Enum<?>> ref = Enums.getEnumConstants(enumClass).get(value);
    /*
     * We use `fromNullable` instead of `of` because `WeakReference.get()` has a nullable return
     * type.
     *
     * In practice, we are very unlikely to see `null`: The `WeakReference` to the enum constant
     * won't be cleared as long as the enum constant is referenced somewhere, and the enum constant

 * hint, so this technique may fail at the whim of the JDK implementation, for example if a user
 * specified the JVM flag {@code -XX:+DisableExplicitGC}. But in practice, it works very well for
 * ordinary tests.
 *
 * <p>Failure of the expected event to occur within an implementation-defined "reasonable" time
 * period or an interrupt while waiting for the expected event will result in a {@link

import okhttp3.internal.okHttpName

/**
 * A set of tasks that are executed in sequential order.
 *
 * Work within queues is not concurrent. This is equivalent to each queue having a dedicated thread
 * for its work; in practice a set of queues may share a set of threads to save resources.
 */
class TaskQueue internal constructor(
  internal val taskRunner: TaskRunner,
  internal val name: String,
) {
  val lock: ReentrantLock = ReentrantLock()

       where you replace `MNG-XXX` and `SUMMARY` with the appropriate JIRA issue.
 - [ ] Also format the first line of the commit message like `[MNG-XXX] SUMMARY`.
       Best practice is to use the JIRA issue title in both the pull request title and in the first line of the commit message.
 - [ ] Write a pull request description that is detailed enough to understand what the pull request does, how, and why.

 * hint, so this technique may fail at the whim of the JDK implementation, for example if a user
 * specified the JVM flag {@code -XX:+DisableExplicitGC}. But in practice, it works very well for
 * ordinary tests.
 *
 * <p>Failure of the expected event to occur within an implementation-defined "reasonable" time
 * period or an interrupt while waiting for the expected event will result in a {@link

# Calls

The HTTP client’s job is to accept your request and produce its response. This is simple in theory but it gets tricky in practice.

## [Requests](https://square.github.io/okhttp/4.x/okhttp/okhttp3/-request/)

Each HTTP request contains a URL, a method (like `GET` or `POST`), and a list of headers. Requests may also contain a body: a data stream of a specific content type.

## [Responses](https://square.github.io/okhttp/4.x/okhttp/okhttp3/-response/)

         * large that doing the lookup is noticeably slower than redoing the work would be.
         *
         * Ideally we'd have a real eviction policy, but until we see a problem in practice, I hope
         * that this will suffice. I have not even benchmarked with different size limits.
         */
        if (validClasses.size() > 1000) {
          validClasses.clear();
        }

      Thread.interrupted();
    }
  }

  /**
   * awaitFullGc() is not quite as reliable a way to ensure calling of a specific finalize method as
   * the more direct await* methods, but should be reliable enough in practice to avoid flakiness of
   * this test. (And if it isn't, we'd like to know about it first!)
   */
  public void testAwaitFullGc() {
    final CountDownLatch finalizerRan = new CountDownLatch(1);

      Thread.interrupted();
    }
  }

  /**
   * awaitFullGc() is not quite as reliable a way to ensure calling of a specific finalize method as
   * the more direct await* methods, but should be reliable enough in practice to avoid flakiness of
   * this test. (And if it isn't, we'd like to know about it first!)
   */
  public void testAwaitFullGc() {
    final CountDownLatch finalizerRan = new CountDownLatch(1);