*
   * <p>If {@code expectedSize} is exactly the number of elements added to the builder before {@link
   * Builder#build} is called, the builder is likely to perform better than an unsized {@link
   * #builder()} would have.
   *
   * <p>It is not specified if any performance benefits apply if {@code expectedSize} is close to,
   * but not exactly, the number of elements added to the builder.

        // condition efficiently without _introducing_ deadlock is probably
        // tricky. For now, just accept the race condition---missing a warning
        // now and then is still better than having no deadlock detection.
        allowedPriorLocks.put(acquiredLock, new ExampleStackTrace(acquiredLock, this));
      } else {
        // Unsafe acquisition order detected. Create and cache a

   *
   * <p>On the other hand, if a signalled thread wakes up to discover that its guard is still not
   * satisfied, it does *not* need to call this method before returning to wait. This can only
   * happen due to spurious wakeup (ignorable) or another thread acquiring the lock before the
   * current thread can and returning the guard to the unsatisfied state. In the latter case the

   * Each bit is set to 1 for all remainders that indicate divisibility by 2, 3, or 5, so
   * 1, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23, 29 are set to 0. 30 and up don't matter because they won't be hit.
   */
  private static final int SIEVE_30 =
      ~((1 << 1) | (1 << 7) | (1 << 11) | (1 << 13) | (1 << 17) | (1 << 19) | (1 << 23)
          | (1 << 29));

  /**

 *       Guava while continuing to run it internally, as we do with many other tests. This would
 *       suffice because we our Android users and tests are using the open-source version, which
 *       would no longer have the problematic test. But why bother when we can instead strip it with
 *       a more precisely named annotation?

    }
  }

  public void testNulls() {
    /*
     * Don't bother testing. All non-primitive parameters are used only to construct error messages.
     * We never want to pass null for them, so we haven't annotated them to say that null is
     * allowed. But at the same time, it seems wasteful to bother inserting the checkNotNull calls
     * that NullPointerTester wants.
     *

    @Override
    public boolean equals(@Nullable Object obj) {
      if (obj instanceof MethodSignature) {
        MethodSignature other = (MethodSignature) obj;
        return name.equals(other.name)
            && parameterTypes.equals(other.parameterTypes)
            && typeSignature.equals(other.typeSignature);
      }

      return false;
    }

    @Override
    public int hashCode() {

    @Override
    public boolean equals(@Nullable Object obj) {
      if (obj instanceof MethodSignature) {
        MethodSignature other = (MethodSignature) obj;
        return name.equals(other.name)
            && parameterTypes.equals(other.parameterTypes)
            && typeSignature.equals(other.typeSignature);
      }

      return false;
    }

    @Override
    public int hashCode() {

 *
 * <p><b>Note:</b> This class intentionally violates the specification of its supertype {@code
 * DataOutput}, which explicitly requires big-endian byte order.
 *
 * @author Chris Nokleberg
 * @author Keith Bottner
 * @since 8.0
 */
@J2ktIncompatible
@GwtIncompatible
@ElementTypesAreNonnullByDefault
public final class LittleEndianDataOutputStream extends FilterOutputStream implements DataOutput {

  /**

    @Override
    public int hashCode() {
      return interner.hashCode();
    }

    @Override
    public boolean equals(@CheckForNull Object other) {
      if (other instanceof InternerFunction) {
        InternerFunction<?> that = (InternerFunction<?>) other;
        return interner.equals(that.interner);
      }

      return false;
    }
  }