verifyTableSize(100, 5, 8);
    verifyTableSize(100, 33, 64);
    verifyTableSize(60, 60, 128);
    verifyTableSize(120, 60, 256);
    // if the table is only double the necessary size, we don't bother resizing it
    verifyTableSize(180, 60, 128);
    // but if it's even bigger than double, we rebuild the table
    verifyTableSize(17, 17, 32);
    verifyTableSize(17, 16, 32);
    verifyTableSize(17, 15, 32);
  }

  }

  /**
   * Not supported. Use {@link #naturalOrder}, which offers better type-safety, instead. This method
   * exists only to hide {@link ImmutableSet#builder} from consumers of {@code ImmutableSortedSet}.
   *
   * @throws UnsupportedOperationException always
   * @deprecated Use {@link ImmutableSortedSet#naturalOrder}, which offers better type-safety.
   */
  @DoNotCall("Use naturalOrder")
  @Deprecated

   *     directly, or use a combination of {@link #throwIfUnchecked} and {@code throw new
   *     RuntimeException(e)}. But consider whether users would be better off if your API threw a
   *     different type of exception. For background on the deprecation, read <a
   *     href="https://goo.gl/Ivn2kc">Why we deprecated {@code Throwables.propagate}</a>.
   */
  @CanIgnoreReturnValue

   *
   * <p><b>Performance note:</b> When feasible, {@code initialCapacity} should be the exact number
   * of values that will be added, if that knowledge is readily available. It is better to guess a
   * value slightly too high than slightly too low. If the value is not exact, the {@link
   * ImmutableIntArray} that is built will very likely occupy more memory than strictly necessary;

   *     directly, or use a combination of {@link #throwIfUnchecked} and {@code throw new
   *     RuntimeException(e)}. But consider whether users would be better off if your API threw a
   *     different type of exception. For background on the deprecation, read <a
   *     href="https://goo.gl/Ivn2kc">Why we deprecated {@code Throwables.propagate}</a>.
   */
  @CanIgnoreReturnValue

 * </ul>
 *
 * Guava contains a number of other multimap implementations, such as {@link ArrayListMultimap}. In
 * new code, we recommend using {@link MultimapBuilder} instead: It provides better control of how
 * keys and values are stored.
 *
 * <h3>Other Notes</h3>
 *
 * <p>As with {@code Map}, the behavior of a {@code Multimap} is not specified if key objects

   *
   * <p><b>Performance note:</b> When feasible, {@code initialCapacity} should be the exact number
   * of values that will be added, if that knowledge is readily available. It is better to guess a
   * value slightly too high than slightly too low. If the value is not exact, the {@link
   * ImmutableDoubleArray} that is built will very likely occupy more memory than strictly

   *
   * @param formal The type whose type variables or itself is mapped to other type(s). It's almost
   *     always a bug if {@code formal} isn't a type variable and contains no type variable. Make
   *     sure you are passing the two parameters in the right order.
   * @param actual The type that the formal type variable(s) are mapped to. It can be or contain yet
   *     other type variables, in which case these type variables will be further resolved if

    Builder<String, Integer> builder =
        ImmutableSortedMap.<String, Integer>naturalOrder()
            .put("one", 1)
            .put("one", 2); // throwing on this line would be even better

    try {
      builder.build();
      fail();
    } catch (IllegalArgumentException expected) {
    }
  }

  public void testOf() {

   *
   * <p>If {@code expectedSize} is exactly the number of elements added to the builder before {@link
   * Builder#build} is called, the builder is likely to perform better than an unsized {@link
   * #builder()} would have.
   *
   * <p>It is not specified if any performance benefits apply if {@code expectedSize} is close to,
   * but not exactly, the number of elements added to the builder.