}
	for _, relations := range embeddedRelations.EmbeddedRelations {
		names = append(names, embeddedValues(relations)...)
	}
	return names
}

// preloadEntryPoint enters layer by layer. It will call real preload if it finds the right entry point.
// If the current relationship is embedded or joined, current query will be ignored.
//
//nolint:cyclop

    for (int i = 1; i < input.length(); i += 2) {
      int k1 = input.charAt(i - 1) | (input.charAt(i) << 16);
      k1 = mixK1(k1);
      h1 = mixH1(h1, k1);
    }

    // deal with any remaining characters
    if ((input.length() & 1) == 1) {
      int k1 = input.charAt(input.length() - 1);
      k1 = mixK1(k1);
      h1 ^= k1;
    }

    return fmix(h1, Chars.BYTES * input.length());

import java.util.Collection;
import java.util.Map.Entry;
import java.util.Set;
import java.util.concurrent.ExecutionException;
import junit.framework.TestCase;

/**
 * {@link LoadingCache} tests that deal with empty caches.
 *
 * @author mike nonemacher
 */

public class EmptyCachesTest extends TestCase {

  public void testEmpty() {
    for (LoadingCache<Object, Object> cache : caches()) {

         * We wish to test whether or not x <= (sqrtFloor + 0.5)^2 = halfSquare + 0.25. Since both x
         * and halfSquare are integers, this is equivalent to testing whether or not x <=
         * halfSquare. (We have to deal with overflow, though.)
         *
         * If we treat halfSquare as an unsigned int, we know that
         *            sqrtFloor^2 <= x < (sqrtFloor + 1)^2

        p.setProperty("jcifs.netbios.cachePolicy", "1200");
        /*
         * The Filter can only work with NTLMv1 as it uses a man-in-the-middle
         * technique that NTLMv2 specifically thwarts. A real NTLM Filter would
         * need to do a NETLOGON RPC that JCIFS will likely never implement
         * because it requires a lot of extra crypto not used by CIFS.
         */

   * The problem with these is that remove(K, long) has to be done in two phases by definition ---
   * first decrementing to zero, and then removing. putIfAbsent or replace could observe the
   * intermediate zero-state. Ways we could deal with this are:
   *
   * - Don't define any of the ConcurrentMap operations. This is the current state of affairs.
   *
   * - Define putIfAbsent and replace as treating zero and absent identically (as currently

import java.util.Collection;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.Map;
import java.util.Map.Entry;
import java.util.Set;
import junit.framework.TestCase;

/**
 * {@link LoadingCache} tests that deal with caches that actually contain some key-value mappings.
 *
 * @author mike nonemacher
 */

public class PopulatedCachesTest extends TestCase {

    // The most common case is that from is a Reader (like InputStreamReader or StringReader) so
    // take advantage of that.
    if (from instanceof Reader) {
      // optimize for common output types which are optimized to deal with char[]
      if (to instanceof StringBuilder) {
        return copyReaderToBuilder((Reader) from, (StringBuilder) to);
      } else {
        return copyReaderToWriter((Reader) from, asWriter(to));
      }
    }

    // Trigger any exception that the comparator would throw for the endpoints.
    /*
     * uncheckedCastNullableTToT is safe as long as the callers are careful to pass a "real" T
     * whenever they pass `true` for the matching `has*Bound` parameter.
     */
    if (hasLowerBound) {
      int unused =
          comparator.compare(

      }
    }

    /*
     * TODO(cpovirk): `return (V) removedValue` once our checker permits that.
     *
     * (We promoted a class of warnings into errors because sometimes they indicate real problems.
     * But now we need to "undo" some instance of spurious errors, as discussed in
     * https://github.com/jspecify/checker-framework/issues/8.)
     */
    return removedValue == null ? null : (V) removedValue;