// Trigger any exception that the comparator would throw for the endpoints.
    /*
     * uncheckedCastNullableTToT is safe as long as the callers are careful to pass a "real" T
     * whenever they pass `true` for the matching `has*Bound` parameter.
     */
    if (hasLowerBound) {
      int unused =
          comparator.compare(

    // Trigger any exception that the comparator would throw for the endpoints.
    /*
     * uncheckedCastNullableTToT is safe as long as the callers are careful to pass a "real" T
     * whenever they pass `true` for the matching `has*Bound` parameter.
     */
    if (hasLowerBound) {
      int unused =
          comparator.compare(

         * We wish to test whether or not x <= (sqrtFloor + 0.5)^2 = halfSquare + 0.25. Since both x
         * and halfSquare are integers, this is equivalent to testing whether or not x <=
         * halfSquare. (We have to deal with overflow, though.)
         *
         * If we treat halfSquare as an unsigned int, we know that
         *            sqrtFloor^2 <= x < (sqrtFloor + 1)^2

	}
	for _, relations := range embeddedRelations.EmbeddedRelations {
		names = append(names, embeddedValues(relations)...)
	}
	return names
}

// preloadEntryPoint enters layer by layer. It will call real preload if it finds the right entry point.
// If the current relationship is embedded or joined, current query will be ignored.
//
//nolint:cyclop

      }
    }

    /*
     * TODO(cpovirk): `return (V) removedValue` once our checker permits that.
     *
     * (We promoted a class of warnings into errors because sometimes they indicate real problems.
     * But now we need to "undo" some instance of spurious errors, as discussed in
     * https://github.com/jspecify/checker-framework/issues/8.)
     */
    return removedValue == null ? null : (V) removedValue;

import junit.framework.Test;
import junit.framework.TestCase;
import junit.framework.TestSuite;
import org.checkerframework.checker.nullness.qual.Nullable;

/**
 * Unit test for {@link TreeMultiset}.
 *
 * @author Neal Kanodia
 */
@GwtCompatible(emulated = true)
@ElementTypesAreNonnullByDefault
public class TreeMultisetTest extends TestCase {

  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // suite
  public static Test suite() {

    if (localFutures != null) {
      return "futures=" + localFutures;
    }
    return super.pendingToString();
  }

  /**
   * Must be called at the end of each subclass's constructor. This method performs the "real"
   * initialization; we can't put this in the constructor because, in the case where futures are
   * already complete, we would not initialize the subclass before calling {@link

                }
              }));
    }

    /*
     * It's unlikely that any operations would fail by throwing an exception, but let's check them
     * just to be safe.
     *
     * The real purpose of this test is to produce a TSAN failure if MapIteratorCache is unsafe for
     * reads from multiple threads -- unsafe, in fact, even in the absence of a concurrent write.

                }
              }));
    }

    /*
     * It's unlikely that any operations would fail by throwing an exception, but let's check them
     * just to be safe.
     *
     * The real purpose of this test is to produce a TSAN failure if MapIteratorCache is unsafe for
     * reads from multiple threads -- unsafe, in fact, even in the absence of a concurrent write.

   * The problem with these is that remove(K, long) has to be done in two phases by definition ---
   * first decrementing to zero, and then removing. putIfAbsent or replace could observe the
   * intermediate zero-state. Ways we could deal with this are:
   *
   * - Don't define any of the ConcurrentMap operations. This is the current state of affairs.
   *
   * - Define putIfAbsent and replace as treating zero and absent identically (as currently