Because `Annotated` can have more than one metadata annotation, you could now even use the same function with other tools, like <a href="https://typer.tiangolo.com/" class="external-link" target="_blank">Typer</a>. 🚀

## Add more validations

* After being able to understand the question, you can give them a possible **answer**.

* In many cases, it's better to understand their **underlying problem or use case**, because there might be a better way to solve it than what they are trying to do.

### Ask to close

If they reply, there's a high chance you would have solved their problem, congrats, **you're a hero**! 🦸

* Now, if that solved their problem, you can ask them to:

    assert response.status_code == 422
    assert response.json() == IsDict(
        {
            "detail": [
                {
                    "type": "greater_than",
                    "loc": ["body", "item", "price"],
                    "msg": "Input should be greater than 0",
                    "input": -3.0,
                    "ctx": {"gt": 0.0},
                }
            ]
        }
    ) | IsDict(

    assert response.status_code == 422
    assert response.json() == IsDict(
        {
            "detail": [
                {
                    "type": "greater_than",
                    "loc": ["body", "item", "price"],
                    "msg": "Input should be greater than 0",
                    "input": -3.0,
                    "ctx": {"gt": 0.0},
                }
            ]
        }
    ) | IsDict(

使用 `Query` 和 `Path`（以及你将在后面看到的其他类）可以声明字符串约束，但也可以声明数值约束。

像下面这样，添加 `ge=1` 后，`item_id` 将必须是一个大于（`g`reater than）或等于（`e`qual）`1` 的整数。

```Python hl_lines="8"
{!../../../docs_src/path_params_numeric_validations/tutorial004.py!}
```

## 数值校验：大于和小于等于

同样的规则适用于：

* `gt`：大于（`g`reater `t`han）
* `le`：小于等于（`l`ess than or `e`qual）

```Python hl_lines="9"
{!../../../docs_src/path_params_numeric_validations/tutorial005.py!}

Import the `Response` class (sub-class) you want to use and declare it in the *path operation decorator*.

For large responses, returning a `Response` directly is much faster than returning a dictionary.

And then they can try again knowing that it's probably something more similar to `stanleyjobsox` than to `johndoe`.

#### A "professional" attack

And as you can have parallelism and asynchronicity at the same time, you get higher performance than most of the tested NodeJS frameworks and on par with Go, which is a compiled language closer to C <a href="https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/#section=data-r17&hw=ph&test=query&l=zijmkf-1" class="external-link" target="_blank">(all thanks to Starlette)</a>.

### Is concurrency better than parallelism?

Nope! That's not the moral of the story.

If you are developing an application with an older non-async framework, and can work with all its defaults, **it can be a great tool**.

But if you need to change some of the defaults, support more than one predefined database, work with an async framework (like FastAPI), etc, you will need to add quite some complex extra code to override those defaults.

                """
                Configuration passed to Pydantic to define if the response data should
                exclude fields set to `None`.

                This is much simpler (less smart) than `response_model_exclude_unset`
                and `response_model_exclude_defaults`. You probably want to use one of
                those two instead of this one, as those allow returning `None` values