public E peek() {
      synchronized (mutex) {
        return delegate().peek();
      }
    }

    @Override
    @CheckForNull
    public E poll() {
      synchronized (mutex) {
        return delegate().poll();
      }
    }

    @Override
    public E remove() {
      synchronized (mutex) {
        return delegate().remove();
      }
    }

    return delegate().offer(e, timeout, unit);
  }

  @CanIgnoreReturnValue // TODO(kak): consider removing this
  @Override
  @CheckForNull
  public E poll(long timeout, TimeUnit unit) throws InterruptedException {
    return delegate().poll(timeout, unit);
  }

  @Override
  public void put(E e) throws InterruptedException {
    delegate().put(e);
  }

  @Override
  public int remainingCapacity() {

    sendRequest(methodName, arguments);
    Thread.sleep(DUE_DILIGENCE_MILLIS);
    assertEquals(true, invokeMethod("hasQueuedThread", this));
    assertNull(responseQueue.poll());
  }

  /**
   * Causes this thread to call the named method, and asserts that this thread thereby waits on the
   * given condition-like object. The lock-like object must have a method equivalent to {@link

 *     .maximumSize(1000)
 *     .create();
 * }</pre>
 *
 * <p>As a {@link Queue} it functions exactly as a {@link PriorityQueue}: its head element -- the
 * implicit target of the methods {@link #peek()}, {@link #poll()} and {@link #remove()} -- is
 * defined as the <i>least</i> element in the queue according to the queue's comparator. But unlike
 * a regular priority queue, the methods {@link #peekLast}, {@link #pollLast} and {@link

    public boolean offer(T o) {
      return standardOffer(o);
    }

    @Override
    public @Nullable T peek() {
      return standardPeek();
    }

    @Override
    public @Nullable T poll() {
      return standardPoll();
    }
  }

  public static Test suite() {
    TestSuite suite = new TestSuite();

    suite.addTestSuite(ForwardingQueueTest.class);
    suite.addTest(

  public void testPoll_empty() {
    assertNull("emptyQueue.poll() should return null", getQueue().poll());
    expectUnchanged();
  }

  @CollectionFeature.Require(SUPPORTS_REMOVE)
  @CollectionSize.Require(ONE)
  public void testPoll_size1() {
    assertEquals("size1Queue.poll() should return first element", e0(), getQueue().poll());
    expectMissing(e0());
  }

      // If even the first one wasn't there, clean up so that the next test doesn't see an element.
      producerThread.cancel(true);
      producer.doneProducing.await();
      if (drained == 0) {
        q.poll(); // not necessarily there if producer was interrupted
      }
    }
  }

  public void testZeroElements() throws Exception {
    for (BlockingQueue<Object> q : blockingQueues()) {
      testZeroElements(q);

      }
    }
  }

  /**
   * Implementation of the InvertedMinMaxPriorityQueue which forwards all calls to a
   * MinMaxPriorityQueue, except poll, which is forwarded to pollMax. That way we can benchmark
   * pollMax using the same code that benchmarks poll.
   */
  static final class InvertedMinMaxPriorityQueue<T> extends ForwardingQueue<T> {
    MinMaxPriorityQueue<T> mmHeap;

  public boolean offer(@ParametricNullness E o) {
    return delegate().offer(o);
  }

  @CanIgnoreReturnValue // TODO(cpovirk): Consider removing this?
  @Override
  @CheckForNull
  public E poll() {
    return delegate().poll();
  }

  @CanIgnoreReturnValue
  @Override
  @ParametricNullness
  public E remove() {
    return delegate().remove();
  }

  @Override
  @CheckForNull
  public E peek() {

    @Override
    public boolean offer(E o) {
      assertTrue(Thread.holdsLock(mutex));
      return delegate.offer(o);
    }

    @Override
    public @Nullable E poll() {
      assertTrue(Thread.holdsLock(mutex));
      return delegate.poll();
    }

    @Override
    public E remove() {
      assertTrue(Thread.holdsLock(mutex));
      return delegate.remove();
    }

    @Override