*       Synchronization policy</a>
 *   <li><a href="https://github.com/google/guava/wiki/GraphsExplained#notes-for-implementors">Notes
 *       for implementors</a>
 * </ul>
 *
 * @author James Sexton
 * @author Joshua O'Madadhain
 * @param <N> Node parameter type
 * @param <E> Edge parameter type
 * @since 20.0
 */
@Beta
@DoNotMock("Use NetworkBuilder to create a real instance")

        *   Using `functools.wraps` on a function with different signature
        *   Using `functools.partial` with an invalid `tf.function` input
    *   `tf.function` now enforces input parameter names to be valid Python identifiers. Incompatible names are automatically sanitized similarly to existing SavedModel signature behavior.

// jp : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.jp
// http://jprs.co.jp/en/jpdomain.html
// Submitted by registry <******@****.***>
jp
// jp organizational type names
ac.jp
ad.jp
co.jp
ed.jp
go.jp
gr.jp
lg.jp
ne.jp
or.jp
// jp prefecture type names
aichi.jp
akita.jp
aomori.jp
chiba.jp
ehime.jp
fukui.jp
fukuoka.jp
fukushima.jp
gifu.jp
gunma.jp
hiroshima.jp

清靈語 <******@****.***> 1705952573 +0800

	    identical, and either both functions are variadic or neither is.
	    Parameter and result names are not required to match.</li>

	<li>Two interface types are identical if they have the same set of methods
	    with the same names and identical function types.
	    <a href="#Exported_identifiers">Non-exported</a> method names from different
	    packages are always different. The order of the methods is irrelevant.</li>

- The Pod API field `.spec.schedulingGates[*].name` now requires qualified names (like `example.com/mygate`), matching validation for names of `.spec.readinessGates[*].name`. Any uses of the alpha scheduling gate feature prior to 1.27 that do not match that validation must be renamed or deleted before upgrading to 1.27. ([#115821](https://github.com/kuber...

arguments must be identifiers denoting the type parameters being declared, one
for each type parameter of the receiver base type.
The type parameter names do not need to match their corresponding parameter names in the
receiver base type definition, and all non-blank parameter names must be unique in the
receiver parameter section and the method signature.
The receiver type parameter constraints are implied by the receiver base type definition:

		if chk := field.TagSettings["CHECK"]; chk != "" {
			names := strings.Split(chk, ",")
			if len(names) > 1 && regEnLetterAndMidline.MatchString(names[0]) {
				checks[names[0]] = CheckConstraint{Name: names[0], Constraint: strings.Join(names[1:], ","), Field: field}
			} else {
				if names[0] == "" {
					chk = strings.Join(names[1:], ",")
				}
				name := schema.namer.CheckerName(schema.Table, field.DBName)

  name of controllers that can be turned on/off that are passed to the `--controllers`
  flag (e.g., `pod-garbage-collector-controller`). The old names (eg `podgc`) are
  also accepted and aliased to the new names. ([#115813](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/115813), [@atiratree](https://github.com/atiratree))
- `kubeadm`: Introduced a new feature gate `UpgradeAddonsBeforeControlPlane` to

                    }
                    if ("view".equals(names[0])) {
                        names[0] = themeName;
                        final Path path = ResourceUtil.getViewTemplatePath(names);
                        Files.createDirectories(path.getParent());
                        Files.copy(zis, path, StandardCopyOption.REPLACE_EXISTING);
                    } else if ("css".equals(names[0])) {
                        names[0] = themeName;