LinkedHashSet<Integer> set = Sets.newLinkedHashSet(LONGER_LIST);
    verifyLinkedHashSetContents(set, LONGER_LIST);
  }

  public void testNewLinkedHashSetFromIterable() {
    LinkedHashSet<Integer> set =
        Sets.newLinkedHashSet(
            new Iterable<Integer>() {
              @Override
              public Iterator<Integer> iterator() {
                return LONGER_LIST.iterator();
              }
            });

  // TODO: Test interrupts with both interruptible and uninterruptible monitor.
  // TODO: Test multiple waiters: If guard is still satisfied, signal next waiter.
  // TODO: Test multiple waiters: If guard is no longer satisfied, do not signal next waiter.

   * so that we get partial compile-time checking.)
   *
   * <p>This workaround should be removed at a distant future time when we no longer support Java
   * versions earlier than 8.
   */
  @SuppressWarnings("removal") // b/318391980
  private static final class TypeVariableInvocationHandler implements InvocationHandler {

    checkNotNull(methodName);
    checkNotNull(conditionLikeObject);
    // TODO: Restore the following line when Monitor.hasWaiters() no longer acquires the lock.
    // assertEquals(false, invokeMethod("hasWaiters", conditionLikeObject));
    sendRequest(methodName, conditionLikeObject);
    Thread.sleep(DUE_DILIGENCE_MILLIS);

   * exception is thrown while refreshing the previous value will remain, <i>and the exception will
   * be logged (using {@link java.util.logging.Logger}) and swallowed</i>.
   *
   * <p>Caches loaded by a {@link CacheLoader} will call {@link CacheLoader#reload} if the cache
   * currently contains a value for {@code key}, and {@link CacheLoader#load} otherwise. Loading is

          </excludePackageNames>
          <!-- Ignore some tags that are found in Java 11 sources but not recognized... under -source 8, I think it was? I can no longer reproduce the failure. -->
          <tags>
            <tag>
              <name>apiNote</name>
              <placement>X</placement>
            </tag>
            <tag>
              <name>implNote</name>

   * until a nonzero result is found; imposes "dictionary order." If the end of one iterable is
   * reached, but not the other, the shorter iterable is considered to be less than the longer one.
   * For example, a lexicographical natural ordering over integers considers {@code [] < [1] < [1,
   * 1] < [1, 2] < [2]}.
   *

   *
   * <p>That iterator supports {@code remove()} if {@code iterable.iterator()} does. After {@code
   * remove()} is called, subsequent cycles omit the removed element, which is no longer in {@code
   * iterable}. The iterator's {@code hasNext()} method returns {@code true} until {@code iterable}
   * is empty.
   *

      int initialSize = map.size();
      iterator.next();
      iterator.remove();
      assertEquals(initialSize - 1, map.size());
      // (We can't assert that the values collection no longer contains the
      // removed value, because the underlying map can have multiple mappings
      // to the same value.)
      assertInvariants(map);
      try {
        iterator.remove();

 * verbosity, and more, from the {@code get} and {@code set} methods. {@code Monitor} implements the
 * same efficient signaling as we had to hand-code in the {@code ReentrantLock} version above.
 * Finally, the programmer no longer has to hand-code the wait loop, and therefore doesn't have to
 * remember to use {@code while} instead of {@code if}.
 *
 * <pre>{@code
 * public class SafeBox<V> {
 *   private V value;