PartASizes‘ÑJ©¤SizeÑJ©¥MTimeÓ ¹ô‡‰O/>§MetaSys ¼x-minio-internal-inline-dataÄ true§MetaUsr‚¬content-type­text/markdown¤etagÙ 4af243ccccbadaf12545¡vÎeçnÐÎÓ° , ¤nullÅ%u&vÎ e ( Š[ ðKšÔŽX·šØü… ‘ˆ*¨Š ÂWåion. Certain features such as versioning, object locking, and bucket replication require distributed deploying MinIO with Erasure Coding. For extended development and production, deploy MinIO with Erasure Coding enabled - specifically, with a *minimum* of 4 drives per MinIO server. See [MinIO Erasure Code...

	return b.LockEnabled || (b.versioningConfig != nil && b.versioningConfig.Enabled()) || (b.objectLockConfig != nil && b.objectLockConfig.Enabled())
}

// ObjectLocking returns true if object locking is enabled
func (b BucketMetadata) ObjectLocking() bool {
	return b.LockEnabled || (b.objectLockConfig != nil && b.objectLockConfig.Enabled())
}

}

// load the cache content with name from minioMetaBackgroundOpsBucket.
// Only backend errors are returned as errors.
// The loader is optimistic and has no locking, but tries 5 times before giving up.
// If the object is not found, a nil error with empty data usage cache is returned.
func (d *dataUsageCache) load(ctx context.Context, store objectIO, name string) error {

    // way for it to return a false negative would be for the target value to jump around in the map
    // such that none of the subsequent iterations observed it, despite the fact that at every point
    // in time it was present somewhere int the map. This becomes increasingly unlikely as
    // CONTAINS_VALUE_RETRIES increases, though without locking it is theoretically possible.

    // way for it to return a false negative would be for the target value to jump around in the map
    // such that none of the subsequent iterations observed it, despite the fact that at every point
    // in time it was present somewhere int the map. This becomes increasingly unlikely as
    // CONTAINS_VALUE_RETRIES increases, though without locking it is theoretically possible.

 *       create a "fake" converter for a unit test. It is unnecessary (and confusing) to <i>mock</i>
 *       the {@code Converter} type using a mocking framework.
 *   <li>Extend this class and implement its {@link #doForward} and {@link #doBackward} methods.
 *   <li><b>Java 8+ users:</b> you may prefer to pass two lambda expressions or method references to

	if s3Error != ErrNone {
		writeErrorResponse(ctx, w, errorCodes.ToAPIErr(s3Error), r.URL)
		return
	}

	if objectLockEnabled {
		// Creating a bucket with locking requires the user having more permissions
		for _, action := range []policy.Action{policy.PutBucketObjectLockConfigurationAction, policy.PutBucketVersioningAction} {
			if !globalIAMSys.IsAllowed(policy.Args{

    were triggered by OkHttp’s feature detection for TLS packages like `org.conscrypt`,
    `org.bouncycastle`, and `org.openjsse`.
 *  Upgrade: Explicitly depend on `kotlin-stdlib-jdk8`. This fixes a problem with dependency
    locking. That's a potential security vulnerability, tracked as [CVE-2022-24329].
 *  Upgrade: [publicsuffix.org data][public_suffix]. This powers `HttpUrl.topPrivateDomain()`.

	}
	return vs, nil
}

// Because we are placing into an Unstructured, place as a map instead
// of structured Istio types.  (The go-client can handle the structured data, but the
// fake go-client used for mocking cannot.)
func unstructureIstioType(spec any) (map[string]any, error) {
	b, err := yaml.Marshal(spec)
	if err != nil {
		return nil, err
	}
	iSpec := map[string]any{}
	err = yaml.Unmarshal(b, &iSpec)

	},
	ErrInvalidLifecycleWithObjectLock: {
		Code:           "InvalidLifecycleWithObjectLock",
		Description:    "The lifecycle configuration containing MaxNoncurrentVersions is not supported with object locking",
		HTTPStatusCode: http.StatusBadRequest,
	},
	ErrNoSuchBucketSSEConfig: {
		Code:           "ServerSideEncryptionConfigurationNotFoundError",
		Description:    "The server side encryption configuration was not found",