* setException() will be a no-op because the Future is already done.
     *
     * Both scenarios are bad: The output Future might never complete, or, if it does complete, it
     * might not run some of its listeners. The likely result is that the app will hang. (And of
     * course stack overflows are bad news in general. For example, we may have overflowed in the

    if (supportsRemove) {
      // We use a copy of "entryToRemove" in the assertion because "entryToRemove" might be
      // invalidated and have undefined behavior after entrySet.removeAll(entriesToRemove),
      // for example entryToRemove.getValue() might be null.
      Entry<K, V> entryToRemoveCopy =
          Helpers.mapEntry(entryToRemove.getKey(), entryToRemove.getValue());

  public static final Integer four = 4;
  public static final Integer five = 5;
  public static final Integer six = 6;
  public static final Integer seven = 7;
  public static final Integer eight = 8;
  public static final Integer nine = 9;
  public static final Integer m1 = -1;
  public static final Integer m2 = -2;
  public static final Integer m3 = -3;
  public static final Integer m4 = -4;

import com.google.caliper.api.SkipThisScenarioException;
import java.util.List;

/**
 * Quick and dirty benchmark of {@link Throwables#lazyStackTrace(Throwable)}. We benchmark a "caller
 * finder" implementation that might be used in a logging framework.
 */
public class LazyStackTraceBenchmark {
  @Param({"20", "200", "2000"})
  int stackDepth;

  @Param({"-1", "3", "15"})
  int breakAt;

  int recursionCount;

    this.queries = sampleData.getQueries();
  }

  @Benchmark
  boolean contains(int reps) {
    // Paranoia: acting on hearsay that accessing fields might be slow
    // Should write a benchmark to test that!
    Set<Element> set = setToTest;
    Element[] queries = this.queries;

    int mask = queries.length - 1;

    boolean dummy = false;

    this.queries = sampleData.getQueries();
  }

  @Benchmark
  boolean contains(int reps) {
    // Paranoia: acting on hearsay that accessing fields might be slow
    // Should write a benchmark to test that!
    Set<Element> set = setToTest;
    Element[] queries = this.queries;

    int mask = queries.length - 1;

    boolean dummy = false;

                (byte) 0x05, (byte) 0x06, (byte) 0x07, (byte) 0x08
              },
              0x89abcdef,
              0x0123456789abcdefL, // asInt/asLong as above, due to equal eight first bytes
              "efcdab89674523010102030405060708"),
          new ExpectedHashCode(
              new byte[] {(byte) 0xdf, (byte) 0x9b, (byte) 0x57, (byte) 0x13},
              0x13579bdf,
              null,

 * such custom interfaces directly; they are implemented only in subclasses. Therefore, forwarding
 * {@code equals} would break symmetry, as the forwarding object might consider itself equal to the
 * object being tested, but the reverse could not be true. This behavior is consistent with the
 * JDK's collection wrappers, such as {@link java.util.Collections#unmodifiableCollection}. Use an

 *       where the {@code ...} contains the names of all the other {@code ParametricNullness}
 *       annotations in Guava. Or you might prefer to omit Guava from your {@code AnnotatedPackages}
 *       list.
 *   <li><a href="https://developers.google.com/j2objc">J2ObjC</a>

 *       where the {@code ...} contains the names of all the other {@code ParametricNullness}
 *       annotations in Guava. Or you might prefer to omit Guava from your {@code AnnotatedPackages}
 *       list.
 *   <li><a href="https://developers.google.com/j2objc">J2ObjC</a>