// Exactly 1 colon. Split into host:port.
        host = hostPortString.substring(0, colonPos);
        portString = hostPortString.substring(colonPos + 1);
      } else {
        // 0 or 2+ colons. Bare hostname or IPv6 literal.
        host = hostPortString;
        hasBracketlessColons = (colonPos >= 0);
      }
    }

    int port = NO_PORT;
    if (!Strings.isNullOrEmpty(portString)) {

    checkNotNull(reason);
    /*
     * All elements of `futures` are completed, or this future has already completed and read
     * `futures` into a local variable (in preparation for propagating cancellation to them). In
     * either case, no one needs to read `futures` for cancellation purposes later. (And
     * cancellation purposes are the main reason to access `futures`, as discussed in its docs.)
     */

 * #lazyWeakReadWriteLock(int) weak} {@code Striped<ReadWriteLock>}. <i>Strong</i> means that all
 * stripes (locks/semaphores) are initialized eagerly, and are not reclaimed unless {@code Striped}
 * itself is reclaimable. <i>Weak</i> means that locks/semaphores are created lazily, and they are
 * allowed to be reclaimed if nobody is holding on to them. This is useful, for example, if one

   * nodes. This is an O(n) operation in the common case (and O(n^2) in the worst), but we are saved
   * by two things.
   *
   * <ul>
   *   <li>This is only called when a waiting thread times out or is interrupted. Both of which
   *       should be rare.
   *   <li>The waiters list should be very short.
   * </ul>
   */
  private void removeWaiter(Waiter node) {

it is a distinct program, so there are some differences.
One is in constant evaluation.
Constant expressions in the assembler are parsed using Go's operator
precedence, not the C-like precedence of the original.
Thus <code>3&amp;1&lt;&lt;2</code> is 4, not 0—it parses as <code>(3&amp;1)&lt;&lt;2</code>
not <code>3&amp;(1&lt;&lt;2)</code>.
Also, constants are always evaluated as 64-bit unsigned integers.

  // on admission requests for ValidatingWebhookConfiguration and MutatingWebhookConfiguration objects.
  repeated k8s.io.api.admissionregistration.v1.RuleWithOperations rules = 3;

  // FailurePolicy defines how unrecognized errors from the admission endpoint are handled -
  // allowed values are Ignore or Fail. Defaults to Ignore.
  // +optional

      } finally {
        monitor.leave();
      }
    } else {
      // It is possible due to races that we are currently in the expected state even though we
      // timed out. e.g. if we weren't event able to grab the lock within the timeout we would never
      // even check the guard. I don't think we care too much about this use case but it could lead
      // to a confusing error message.

Having another process manager inside the container (as would be with Gunicorn or Uvicorn managing Uvicorn workers) would only add **unnecessary complexity** that you are most probably already taking care of with your cluster system.

### Containers with Multiple Processes and Special Cases

Of course, there are **special cases** where you could want to have **a container** with a **Gunicorn process manager** starting several **Uvicorn worker processes** inside.

---

Here's how to help others with questions (in discussions or issues):

### Understand the question

* Check if you can understand what is the **purpose** and use case of the person asking.

* Then check if the question (the vast majority are questions) is **clear**.

     */
    FAILED,
  }

  /**
   * A listener for the various state changes that a {@link Service} goes through in its lifecycle.
   *
   * <p>All methods are no-ops by default, implementors should override the ones they care about.
   *
   * @author Luke Sandberg
   * @since 15.0 (present as an interface in 13.0)
   */
  abstract class Listener {
    /**